Opinion

Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits v. Kyle J. Sherman Excavating, LLC

Court
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Filed
Feb 28, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.4%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

EASTERN DIVISION

Boards of Trustees of the

Ohio Laborers Benefits, Case No: 2:23-cv-2476

Plaintiffs, Judge Graham

v.

Magistrate Judge Jolson

Kyle J. Sherman Excavating, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, filed

December 15, 2023. ECF No. 10. An Entry of Default against Defendant was entered by the Clerk

on October 10, 2023. ECF No. 6. Plaintiffs seek a judgment for liquidated damages, interest,

attorney’s fees, and costs. Pls.’ Mot., 2. Plaintiffs have submitted a Declaration of Brian Gaston

(ECF No 10-1) and Declaration of Ryan K. Hymore (ECF No. 10-7) in support of the amounts

sought. Plaintiffs represent that they have served their motion on the Defendant by regular mail.

Plaintiffs are fiduciaries of four (4) employee benefit plans established pursuant to various

collective bargaining agreements. In examining a motion for default judgment under Fed. R. Civ.

P. 55(b)(2), the Court accepts plaintiff’s well-pled allegations as to a defendant’s liability as true.

Antoine v. Atlas Turner, Inc., 66 F.3d 105, 110 (6th Cir. 1995). The court reviews “the pleadings

as a whole to determine whether a sufficient basis exists entitling Plaintiff to judgment pursuant to

Rule 55(b).” United States v. Allen, No. 2:12-CV-1034, 2014 WL 5305518, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Oct.

15, 2014) (quoting Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, 515 F.2d 1200,

1206 (5th Cir. 1975)) (internal quotations omitted).

Employers violate 29 U.S.C. § 185 when they breach the terms of a collective bargaining

agreement. The elements of a breach of collective bargaining agreement claim mirror the standard

breach of contract elements, and Plaintiffs must prove that they are entitled to enforce the collective

bargaining agreement as third-party beneficiaries. Anderson v. AT&T Corp., 147 F.3d 467, 473

(6th Cir. 1998). Additionally, 29 U.S.C. § 1145 empowers trustees of union employee benefit plans

to sue employers in federal court to enforce the terms of contractual agreements when employers

are not timely paying into the benefit plan on behalf of their employees. Laborers Health &

Welfare Tr. Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co., 484 U.S. 539, 546, 108 S. Ct. 830, 834

(1988).

The complaint alleges that Defendant entered into collective bargaining agreements which

required Defendant to “file monthly contribution reports, permit audits of its financial records, and

make hourly contributions to the Ohio Laborers Benefits.” Pls.’ Comp., ¶¶ 7-9. The Complaint

alleges that Defendant failed to perform these obligations. Id. at ¶ 17.

The Court finds that the allegations sufficiently allege that Plaintiffs are fiduciaries entitled

to enforce the collective bargaining agreement. Additionally, the Court finds that these allegations

set forth a sufficient basis to sustain a claim for breach of the collective bargaining agreement in

violation of 29 U.S.C. § 185 as well as a violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1145, and that Plaintiffs are

therefore entitled to default judgment under Rule 55(b).

The Court may enter an award without a hearing when “plaintiff’s claim is for a sum certain

or a sum that can be made certain by computation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1). Plaintiffs have

submitted documentation supporting the calculated damages and interest (ECF No 10-1) and

supporting the amount of attorney fees and court costs (ECF No. 10-7). The Court finds these

damages to be for a “sum certain,” and the Court further finds the attorney fees and costs to be

reasonable.

The Court finds, upon the materials before it, that Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment in the

amounts as follows: $13,472.01 in liquidated damages, $1,105.86 in interest, $3,285.76 in

attorneys’ fees, and $536.73 in court costs. Plaintiffs have stated that Defendant is entitled to a

credit of $1,813.56. See Pl.’s Mot., 2 n.1. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS default judgment in

the total amount of $16,586.80.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ James L. Graham

JAMES L. GRAHAM

DATE: February 28, 2024 United States District Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.