Opinion

Dixon v. Reid

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Apr 23, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.8%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EDLOECC #T:R ONIC ALLY FILED

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 4/23/2 024

-------------------------------------------------------------- X

:

DREW DIXON, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

-against- : ORDER

:

ANTONIO MARQUIS L.A. REID, : 23-CV-9878 (VEC)

:

Defendant. :

:

-------------------------------------------------------------- X

PROTECTIVE ORDER

1. This Order is being entered to facilitate the production, exchange, and discovery

of documents and information that the Parties, and as appropriate, non-parties, believe in good

faith merit Confidential treatment. The Parties were unable to agree on all material terms, so the

Court is entering an order that is broadly consistent with the provisions the Parties could agree

on. The Parties have informed the court that it is their intent that information will not be

designated as Confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing will be so designated unless it is

sensitive information and there is a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential,

non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this

case.

2. Nothing in this Protective Order shall be interpreted or construed as changing any

burden of proof or persuasion with respect to any Confidentiality designation or burden with

respect to any sealing request.

3. “Designating Party” shall mean the Parties to this action and any non-party

designating discovery as Confidential.

4. “Receiving Party” shall mean the Parties to this action and any non-party

receiving, or who has been informed that, discovery has been designated as Confidential.

5. “Producing Party” shall mean the parties to this action and any non-parties who

produce discovery in the action.

6. With respect to discovery (i.e., documents, information or tangible things of any

kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) (“Discovery Material”) that

has been designated as “Confidential” pursuant to this Order, no Receiving Party may disclose

such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder.

7. The Designating Party may designate as Confidential only the portion of such

Discovery Material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of proprietary, trade

secret or other sensitive, non-public information. This includes without limitation the following:

(a) medical, mental health and/or other health care records;

(b) Social Security numbers, personal telephone numbers and emails, physical

addresses and/or financial information of any person;

(c) names of alleged victims of sexual abuse/harassment

and sexual partners;

(d) personnel and other non-public employment records;

(e) private, sensitive information regarding a Party’s or non-parties’ personal life

and;

(f) extracts and summaries of any information identified in (a)–(e);

(g) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after

the date of this Order.

8. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than

deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Designating Party or his or her respective counsel may

designate such portion as “Confidential” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as

“Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or

audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with

the confidential information redacted.

9. A Designating Party or his or her counsel may designate deposition exhibits or

portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on

the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case

the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it

as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all

counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific

pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential,” in which case all

counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated

transcript in their possession or under their control as Confidential. During the 30-day period

following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been

designated Confidential. If at any time before the termination of this action a Designating Party

realizes that it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that

it previously produced or received without limitation, the Designating Party may so designate

such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, the Receiving Party will treat such

designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential. In addition, the Designating

Party shall provide all Parties with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears

the “Confidential” designation within two business days of providing such notice.

10. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or

non-party of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or

protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other

evidence.

11. Where a Designating Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, the

Receiving Party may disclose such information to only the following persons:

(a) the Parties to this action;

(b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical,

or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter;

(c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and

document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter,

provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form

annexed as Exhibit A hereto;

(d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this

Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure

Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto;

(e) any deposition witness who is advised of this Protective Order and agrees on

the record to maintain the information as Confidential;

(f) any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to

testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed

a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto;

(g) any person a Party retains to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide

specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person

has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A

hereto;

(h) stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions the Parties conduct in this

action; and

(i) this Court, including any appellate court, its support personnel, and court

reporters.

12. Before disclosing any Confidential Discovery Material to any person referred to

in subparagraphs 11(c), 11(d), 11(e), or 11(f) above, counsel must provide a copy of this Order to

such person, who must sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A

hereto stating that he or she has read this Order and agrees to be bound by its terms. Said counsel

must retain each signed Non-Disclosure Agreement, hold it in escrow, and produce it to

opposing counsel either before such person is permitted to testify (at deposition or trial) or at the

conclusion of the case including any and all appeals, whichever comes first.

13. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in Paragraph 11 shall impose any limitation

on the ability of a Producing Party to disclose its own Confidential Discovery Material. A

Producing Party shall not be required to obtain an executed Non-Disclosure Agreement from its

own current or former employees with respect to disclosure of its own Confidential Discovery

Material.

14. This Order binds the Parties and certain others to treat as Confidential any

Discovery Materials so classified. The Court has not, however, made any finding regarding the

confidentiality of any Discovery Materials, and retains full discretion to determine whether to

afford Confidential treatment to any Discovery Material designated as Confidential hereunder.

15. This Order shall have no force and effect on the use of any Discovery Material at

trial or at a pretrial hearing before the Court in this matter.

16. In filing Confidential Discovery Material with this Court, or filing portions of any

pleadings, motions, or other papers that disclose such Confidential Discovery Material

(“Confidential Court Submission”), the Parties shall publicly file a redacted copy of the

Confidential Court Submission via the Electronic Case Filing System. The Parties shall file an

unredacted copy of the Confidential Court Submission under seal with the Clerk of this Court,

and the Parties shall serve this Court and opposing counsel with unredacted courtesy copies of

the Confidential Court Submission. Any Party that seeks to file Confidential Discovery Material

under seal must file an application and supporting declaration justifying—on a particularized

basis—the sealing of such documents. The parties should be aware that the Court will unseal

documents if it is unable to make “specific, on the record findings . . . demonstrating that closure

is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest.” Lugosch v.

Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). Notwithstanding any other

provision of this paragraph, if the Parties stipulate that specific portions of a document are both

Confidential and immaterial to this lawsuit, a party may publicly file a version of the document

with those confidential and immaterial portions redacted, and that party need not submit an

unredacted version to the Court or file a motion to seal.

17. If the motion to seal is granted, the filing Party (or, as appropriate, non-party)

shall ensure that all documents (or, if directed by the Court, portions of documents) that are the

subject of the order to seal are filed in accordance with the procedures that govern the filing of

sealed documents on the Electronic Court Filing system. If a Designating Party’s timely motion

to seal is denied, then the Party (or, as appropriate, non-party) making the filing shall take steps

to replace the Redacted Filing with its corresponding unredacted version.

18. Any Party who objects to any designation of Confidentiality may at any time

serve upon counsel for the Designating Party a written notice stating the grounds of the

objection. If the Parties cannot resolve the objection within 10 days after the time the notice is

received, it shall be the obligation of the party challenging the designation to file an appropriate

motion requesting that the Court determine whether the disputed information should be subject

to the terms of this Order. If the party challenging the designation fails to file such a motion

within the prescribed time, the disputed information shall be treated as Confidential in

accordance with this Order. In the face of an objection to a designation of Confidentiality, the

Designating Party shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed

information to be treated as Confidential. The Parties shall treat the disputed materials as

Confidential pending the Court’s resolution of a timely-filed motion.

19. Any Party who requests additional limits on disclosure (such as “attorneys’ eyes

only” in appropriate circumstances) may at any time serve upon counsel for the Receiving

Parties a written notice stating with particularity the grounds of the request. If the Parties cannot

reach agreement promptly, the party requesting additional limits on disclosure bears to burden to

make a motion to the Court.

20. Absent an Order from a court of competent jurisdiction, recipients of Confidential

Discovery Material under this Order may use such material solely for the prosecution and

defense of this action, any appeals thereto, and any alternative dispute resolution proceeding

intended to resolve this action, and not for any other purpose or in any other litigation

proceeding. Nothing contained in this Order, however, will affect or restrict the rights of any

Party with respect to its own documents or information produced in this action. Nor shall

anything contained in this Order prejudice a Party’s ability to seek discovery in this and any

other legal proceeding, without prejudice to any other Party’s right to object to such discovery.

21. Nothing in this Order will prevent any Party from producing any Confidential

Discovery Material in its possession in response to a lawful subpoena or other compulsory

process, or if required to produce by law or by any government agency having jurisdiction,

provided that, unless precluded by applicable laws or rules, such Party gives written notice to the

Producing Party as soon as reasonably possible, and if permitted by the time allowed under the

request, at least 10 days before any disclosure. Upon receiving such notice, the Producing Party

will bear the burden to oppose compliance with the subpoena, other compulsory process, or other

legal notice if the Producing Party deems it appropriate to do so.

22. Each person who has access to Discovery Material designated as Confidential

pursuant to this Order must take all reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized or

inadvertent disclosure of such material.

23. If a Receiving Party receives documents or other materials that it has reason to

believe are subject to a good faith claim of attorney-client privilege, work product protection, or

other privilege or immunity from disclosure, the Receiving Party must refrain from examining

the documents or other materials any more than is essential to ascertain whether the documents

or other materials are reasonably subject to such a claim. The Receiving Party shall promptly

notify the producing person in writing that the Receiving Party possesses documents or other

material that appears to be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.

24. If, in connection with this litigation, a Producing Party inadvertently discloses

information that is subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product

protection, or any other privilege or immunity from disclosure (“Inadvertently Disclosed

Information”), such disclosure shall not constitute or be deemed a waiver or forfeiture of any

claim of privilege, work product protection, or other privilege or immunity from discovery with

respect to the Inadvertently Disclosed Information or its subject matter. In addition, a Producing

Party may use its own document (e.g., as a deposition exhibit) containing material that is subject

to a claim of privilege or immunity from disclosure for the purpose of establishing the basis of

such claim without waiver of any applicable privilege or immunity from disclosure, unless the

Producing Party affirmatively uses or relies upon the specific material contained in the document

that is subject to the claim of privilege or immunity from disclosure for any purpose other than

establishing the basis of such claim.

25. If the Producing Party seeks to claw back Inadvertently Disclosed Information,

the Producing Party must provide notice in writing to the Receiving Party specifying the

production number of the documents or a detailed reference to the testimony it wishes to claw

back and the basis of the claim of attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, and/or any

other applicable privilege or immunity relied upon in support of its request.

26. If a Producing Party makes a claim of inadvertent disclosure, the Receiving Party

shall, within five business days, return or destroy all copies of the Inadvertently Disclosed

Information, and provide a certification of counsel that all such information has been returned or

destroyed, unless the Receiving Party seeks to dispute that the information is privileged or

otherwise protected as set forth below. Until the dispute is resolved or ruled upon, the Receiving

Party shall undertake to keep such information restricted solely for use in connection with the

dispute over the privilege or protection.

27. Within five business days after the notification that such Inadvertently Disclosed

Information has been returned or destroyed, the Producing Party shall produce a privilege log

with respect to the Inadvertently Disclosed Information.

28. The Receiving Party may move the Court for an Order compelling production of

the Inadvertently Disclosed Information. Pursuant to the Parties’ obligations set forth herein, the

motion shall not quote or paraphrase the substance of the document subject to the motion to

compel beyond the description of the document contained in the privilege log entry for the

document. The motion shall be filed under seal and shall not assert as a ground for entering such

an Order the fact or circumstances of the inadvertent production in this action.

29. The Producing Party retains the burden of establishing the privileged or protected

nature of any Inadvertently Disclosed Information. Nothing in this Order shall limit the right of

any Producing Party or Receiving Party to request an in camera review of the Inadvertently

Disclosed Information.

30. Unless the Parties otherwise agree or a court of competent jurisdiction otherwise

orders, within 60 days of the final disposition of this action—including all appeals—all

Receiving Parties must either return all hard copy Confidential Discovery Material—including

all copies thereof—to the Producing Party, or destroy such material—including all copies

thereof. In either event, by the 60-day deadline, the Receiving Party must certify its return or

destruction by submitting a written certification to the Producing Party that affirms that it has not

retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or other forms of reproducing or

capturing any of the Confidential Discovery Material. Notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) the

Parties shall confirm that they will continue to treat as Confidential any Discovery Materials so

designated that have been received electronically and that cannot be returned or destroyed, and

shall take reasonable measures to ensure that unauthorized persons do not have access to

Confidential information; and (11) outside counsel for the Parties are permitted to retain one

copies of all pleadings, motion papers, court filings made under seal, transcripts, legal

memoranda, correspondence, attorney work product, written discovery responses, deposition and

trial exhibits, and expert reports, even if such materials contain Confidential Discovery Material,

subject to a continuing obligation to protect information designated Confidential pursuant to this

Order.

31. This Order will survive the termination of the litigation and will continue to be

binding upon each Receiving Party.

32. This Court will retain jurisdiction over all persons subject to this Order to the

extent necessary to enforce any obligations arising hereunder or to impose sanctions for any

contempt thereof.

Date: April 23, 2024

SO ORDERED □ -

HON. VALERIE CAPRONI

11

Exhibit A to Protective Order

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DREW DIXON,

Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:23-cv-09878-VEC

v.

ANTONIO MARQUIS “L.A.” REID,

Defendant.

_____________________________________ /

NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

I, _______________________________, acknowledge that I have read and understand the

Protective Order in this action governing the non-disclosure of those portions of Discovery

Material that have been designated as Confidential. I agree that I will not disclose such Confidential

Discovery Material to anyone other than for purposes of this litigation and that at the conclusion

of the litigation I will return all discovery information to the Party or attorney from whom I

received it. By acknowledging these obligations under the Protective Order, I understand that I am

submitting myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District

of New York for the purpose of any issue or dispute arising hereunder and that my willful violation

of any term of the Protective Order could subject me to punishment for contempt of Court.

______________________________

Date:

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.