Opinion

Board of Trustees of the I.A.T.S.E. Annuity Fund v. National Convention Services, LLC

Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Apr 10, 2024
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 27.8%

The opinion

ona

DOCUMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC Ho

DATE FILED: 4/10/2024

Board of Trustees of the I.A.1.S.E. Annuity

Fund et al.,

1:24-cv-00019 (GHW) (SDA

Plaintiffs, v (

. ORDER

-against-

National Convention Services, LLC,

Defendant.

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action on January 2, 2024. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On

January 3, 2024, this action was referred to the undersigned for general pretrial and dispositive

motions. (Referral Order, ECF No. 6.) Defendant was served with the Summons and Complaint

on January 25, 2024. (See Summons Returned Executed, ECF No. 7.) Defendant thereafter failed

to timely enter an appearance in this action.

On March 26, 2024, the Court entered an Order stating that, if Defendant did not appear

by April 2, 2024, Plaintiffs were to seek a certificate of default from the Clerk of Court no later

than April 9, 2024. (3/26/24 Order, ECF No. 10.) A Clerk’s Certificate of Default was entered on

April 8, 2024. (Clerk’s Cert. Of Default, ECF No. 15.)

Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered that Plaintiffs shall file a motion for default judgment no

later than May 1, 2024. Plaintiffs’ motion shall include the elements of each asserted cause of

action and shall demonstrate how Plaintiffs’ allegations establish Defendant’s liability as to each.

See, e.g., LG Capital Funding, LLC v. FLASR, Inc., 422 F. Supp. 3d 611, 623 (E.D.N.Y. 2018) (“With

respect to liability, a defendant’s default does no more than concede the complaint’s factual

allegations; it remains the plaintiff’s burden to demonstrate that those uncontroverted

allegations, without more, establish the defendant’s liability on each asserted cause of action.”).

In addition, Plaintiffs shall file Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

concerning all damages and any other relief that Plaintiffs seek. The submission shall contain a

concluding paragraph that succinctly summarizes what damage amount (or other monetary

relief) is being sought, including the exact dollar amount. Plaintiffs’ Proposed Findings of Fact

should specifically tie the proposed damages figure to the legal claim(s) on which liability has

been established; should demonstrate how Plaintiffs arrived at the proposed damages figure;

and should be supported by one or more affidavits, which may attach any documentary evidence

establishing the proposed damages. Each Proposed Finding of Fact shall be followed by a citation

to the paragraphs of the affidavit(s) and or page of documentary evidence that supports each

such Proposed Finding.1

In lieu of conclusions of law, Plaintiffs may submit a memorandum of law setting forth the

legal principles applicable to Plaintiffs’ claim or claims for damages (including but not limited to

the legal basis for any claim for interest or attorneys’ fees). Plaintiffs’ papers must include an

affidavit from someone with personal knowledge, setting forth the facts which establish that the

Court has both personal jurisdiction over the Defendant and jurisdiction over the subject matter.

1 Any request for attorneys’ fees must be supported by contemporaneous time records showing, for each

attorney, the date of service, the hours expended, and the nature of the work performed. Counsel should

also provide the number of years they have been admitted to the bar and their hourly rate. Finally, the

Conclusions of Law shall include a paragraph or paragraphs setting forth the legal basis for any requested

award of attorneys’ fees, including why, if applicable, the number of attorneys involved are entitled to

fees.

The Court hereby notifies the parties that it may conduct the damages inquest based

solely upon the written submissions of the parties. See Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 2,

Albany, N.Y. Pension Fund v. Moulton Masonry & Const., LLC, 779 F.3d 182, 189 (2d Cir. 2015)

(quoting Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co., 951 F.2d 504, 508 (2d Cir. 1991)); Cement & Concrete

Workers Dist. Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, Educ. & Training Fund & Other

Funds v. Metro Found. Contractors Inc., 699 F.3d 230, 234 (2d Cir. 2012) (citation omitted). To

the extent that any party seeks an evidentiary hearing on the issue of damages, such party must

set forth in its submission the reason why the inquest should not be conducted based upon the

written submissions alone, including a description of what witnesses would be called to testify at

a hearing and the nature of the evidence that would be submitted.

It is further Ordered that, no later than May 1, 2024, Plaintiffs shall serve its motion

papers, along with a copy of this Order, on Defendant and file proof of service on the docket.

Defendant shall send to Plaintiffs’ counsel and file with the Court its response, if any, to Plaintiffs’

submissions no later than May 15, 2024.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York

April 10, 2024 dt On

rick A.

STEWART D. AARON

United States Magistrate Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.