The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1437
WALDO FENNER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DURHAM/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00383-TDS-JLW)
Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: July 29, 2013
Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Waldo Fenner, Appellant Pro Se. Emmanuel Dubois McGirt, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Waldo Fenner appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on Fenner’s 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Fenner v. City of Durham/Board of Adjustment,
No. 1:10-cv-00383-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2