The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
KARINE TRAVIESO, Case No. 1:21-cv-06998
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND
v.
[PROPOSED]
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER
MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER, L.L.C., and
JOANN NEALE, and GARY STEVENSON,
individually,
Defendants.
The Parties herein, through their undersigned counsel, HEREBY STIPULATE to the
following and request that this Stipulation and Confidentiality Order (the “Confidentiality
Order”) be entered as an Order of the Court:
1. Any person or entity subject to this Confidentiality Order—including, without
limitation, the Parties, their representatives, agents, experts, consultants, all third parties
providing discovery in the above-captioned action (the “Action”), and all other interested
persons with actual or constructive notice of this Confidentiality Order—shall adhere to the
terms of this Confidentiality Order.
2. The terms and conditions of this Confidentiality Order shall be applicable to and
shall govern all information, regardless of medium or format, and all documents and all tangible
things produced in response to any discovery request or subpoena in this Action, including
without limitation all responses to requests for production, documents and other tangible things
produced to a Party, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admissions, deposition
testimony, and all other discovery taken pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
(“Discovery Material” or “Discovery Materials”). The terms “Discovery Material” and
“Discovery Materials” shall also include all such information, documents, and things produced in
connection with this Action voluntarily, or pursuant to a rule, order, or other requirement.
3. When used in this Confidentiality Order, the word “document” shall have the
meaning set forth in Local Civil Rule 26.3(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Local Rules”), and includes copies of material
encompassed by the definition of “document.”
4. “Confidential Information” as used herein means any type or classification of
information in any of the Discovery Materials that is designated as “Confidential” or “Attorneys’
Eyes Only” in accordance with this Confidentiality Order. When used in this Confidentiality
Order, a Party that designates information as Confidential Information in connection with this
Action is a “Designating Party.”
5. Any Party to this Action may designate as “Confidential” any Discovery
Materials that it reasonably believes contain non-public business, commercial, financial,
proprietary, competitive, or personal information, the public disclosure of which is either
restricted by law or could, in the good faith opinion of the Designating Party, adversely affect or
cause injury to a Party’s business or business relationships with others or that contain other
information for which a good faith claim of the need for protection from disclosure can be made
under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or other applicable law or any other agreements.
Such Discovery Materials shall be marked as “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “Confidential”).
6. Any Party to this Action may designate as “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” any Discovery
Materials that counsel for the Designating Party reasonably and in good faith believes contain or
reflect highly confidential information that comprises highly sensitive technical, business,
commercial, financial, proprietary, or research information that has not been made public and
could cause a Party to suffer substantial competitive or other harm if publicly known or known
by the non-designating Party, or agents or employees of the Parties who would have access to the
Discovery Materials under this Confidentiality Order. Such Discovery Materials shall be marked
as “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” (hereinafter “Attorneys’ Eyes Only”).
7. Confidential Information shall not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than
for the prosecution, defense, appeal, or settlement of this Action. Any use of information
obtained from Discovery Materials designated as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only for any
purpose other than the prosecution, defense, appeal, or settlement of this Action, including in any
communications with the press or for any business purpose, is expressly prohibited and would
constitute a material breach of this Confidentiality Order.
8. The Designating Party shall not designate as Confidential Information documents
or things that are known by the Designating Party to be available to members of the general
public.
9. Production of any Discovery Materials without a designation of Confidential or
Attorneys’ Eyes Only shall not be deemed a waiver of any Party’s claim of confidentiality as to
such matter. The initial failure to designate Discovery Materials in accordance with this
Confidentiality Order shall not preclude any Party, at a later date, from designating such
materials Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only. If any Party to this Action realizes that some
portion(s) of Discovery Materials that were previously produced without limitation should be
designated as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only, the Party may also designate it by apprising
all Parties in writing, by written notice to counsel of record, and such designated portion(s) of the
Discovery Materials will thereafter be treated as Confidential Information under the terms of this
Confidentiality Order as if they had been initially designated as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes
Only. Upon receipt of such notice, all Parties to this Action shall restrict the disclosure or use of
such material to those persons qualified pursuant to this Confidentiality Order, and, if such
material has previously been disclosed to persons not qualified pursuant to this Confidentiality
Order, the Party that disclosed the material shall take reasonable steps to obtain all such
previously disclosed Confidential Discovery Materials and advise such persons of the
designation of confidentiality. The Designating Party shall supply, at its own cost, replacement
pages containing the new designation of confidentiality.
10. The inadvertent production or disclosure of any document or communication that
is subject to an attorney-client, attorney work product, or other privilege will not be deemed a
waiver or forfeiture of such privilege, provided that the Party entitled to assert such privilege
notifies the Parties to whom such inadvertent disclosure or production was made in writing upon
discovery of such inadvertent disclosure. If any Party makes a claim of inadvertent disclosure of
privileged or protected information, the other Parties shall, within forty-eight (48) hours, return
or destroy all copies of the inadvertently disclosed information (including all copies provided to
third parties under this Confidentiality Order), and provide a certification of counsel that all such
information has been returned or destroyed. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the notification that
such inadvertently disclosed information has been returned or destroyed, the Party that disclosed
the material shall produce a privilege log with respect to that inadvertently disclosed information.
The other Parties may move the Court for an Order compelling production of the inadvertently
disclosed information. The motion shall be filed under seal. The Party that disclosed the
material retains the burden of establishing the privileged or protected nature of any inadvertently
disclosed information. The other Parties shall not assert waiver due to the inadvertent production
as a ground for such motion. Nothing in this Confidentiality Order shall limit the right of any
Party to request an in camera review of the inadvertently disclosed information. The production
of any document during discovery in this Action that, absent such production, would have been
in whole or in part privileged or otherwise immune from disclosure, will not waive the privilege,
work product protection, or other immunity from disclosure as to any material not produced,
regardless of the subject matter.
11. In the case of depositions, designation of the transcript or the portions of the
transcript that contains Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Discovery Materials shall be made
by a statement to such effect, on the record, during the course of the deposition, or by a statement
in writing sent to all counsel of record within 10 business days after receipt of the transcript of
such deposition, and the court reporter will be directed to affix a Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes
Only designation to such portions. Until the expiration of the period of 10 days, the Parties shall
treat the entire transcript as Confidential Discovery Material. The Parties may modify this
procedure for any particular deposition, through agreement on the record at such deposition (or
thereafter in writing) without further order of the Court.
12. Any Party objecting to the designation of any information as Confidential or
Attorneys’ Eyes Only must give counsel for the Designating Party written notice of the objection
and its reasons for the objection, and the Parties shall attempt in good faith to resolve their
differences. Failing resolution, the Parties may challenge the designation in accordance with the
Local Rules and this Court’s individual practices. Until the Court rules on the dispute, the
Discovery Material shall be treated as designated.
13. The undersigned will treat Discovery Materials that are designated by a third
party as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only in accordance with the terms and conditions of
this Confidentiality Order regardless of whether the third party is or becomes a signatory to this
Confidentiality Order.
14. Discovery Material designated as Confidential shall only be disclosed to:
(a) Counsel of record for the Parties in this Action, including partners,
associates, co-counsel, legal assistants, secretaries or other support
staff of such counsel assigned to assist such counsel, and solely for
the purposes of this Action;
(b) Any contract support personnel employed or retained by, any of
the counsel covered by Paragraph 14(a) above;
(c) The Parties themselves. Defendants may disclose Confidential
Information to MLS employees, officers and in-house counsel, to
whom, in the good faith opinion of counsel of record for
Defendants, it is reasonably necessary that Confidential
Information be shown solely for the purposes of this Litigation.
(d) The Court and its staff as well as any mediators or other Court-
appointed personnel responsible for resolving this Action in a non-
judicial forum;
(e) Court reporters and videographers present at depositions;
(f) Subject to compliance with Paragraph 15 of this Confidentiality
Order, outside experts or consultants who are not regular
employees of a Party but are retained by a Party or counsel for a
Party to assist in the prosecution or defense of this Action;
(g) Vendors retained by or for the Parties to assist in preparing for
pretrial discovery, trial and/or hearings including, but not limited
to, court reporters, litigation support personnel, jury consultants,
individuals to prepare demonstrative and audiovisual aids for use
in the courtroom or in depositions or mock jury sessions, as well as
their staff, stenographic, and clerical employees whose duties and
responsibilities require access to such materials;
(h) Any person indicated on the face of a document or accompanying
cover letter, email or other communication to be the author,
addressee or an actual authorized recipient of the document, or in
the case of meeting minutes, an attendee of the meeting;
(i) Subject to compliance with Paragraph 15 of this Confidentiality
Order, a deponent during a deposition if it appears that the witness
authored or received a copy of such document, was involved in the
subject matter described therein, or is a current or former
employee, officer, director, agent, or designated corporate
representative of the Party who produced the information,
document, or thing, or if the Parties consent to such disclosure;
(j) Upon subpoena by an administrative agency prosecutor, criminal
or civil or law enforcement officer or Court order subject to
Paragraph 17 below; and
(k) Any other person agreed to by the Parties in writing;
15. Subject to the other provisions of this Confidentiality Order, individuals
that fall under paragraphs 15(f) and 15(i), above, may not be given access to any
information or material designated as Confidential unless they have signed the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
16. Material produced and marked as Attorneys’ Eyes Only may be disclosed
only to the Parties’ outside counsel. Material produced and marked as Attorneys’ Eyes
Only may be disclosed to other persons as counsel for the Designating Party agrees in
advance in writing or as Ordered by the Court.
17. The disclosure of Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Discovery Materials
covered by this Confidentiality Order, whether pursuant to compelled discovery or otherwise,
shall not constitute a waiver of any proprietary or other rights to or in such information. If any
person or entity covered by this Confidentiality Order is subpoenaed in another action or
proceeding, served with a document demand, or otherwise requested to provide material covered
by this Confidentiality Order, and such subpoena, document demand, or request seeks material
which was produced or designated as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only by any Designating
Party, the person or entity receiving the subpoena, document demand or request shall give
written notice immediately (no more than two (2) business days after receipt) to all counsel of
record and shall, to the extent permitted by law, withhold production of the material until any
dispute relating to the production of such material is resolved.
18. Information designated as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only may be copied or
reproduced only to the extent reasonably necessary for the conduct of this Action. All such
copies or reproductions shall be subject to the terms of this Confidentiality Order.
19. Any person given access to any Discovery Materials containing Confidential
Information shall take reasonable care to ensure that the information is not communicated or
disclosed to anyone not authorized by paragraphs 14 and 16 of this Confidentiality Order to
receive such information. If any person given access to any Discovery Materials containing
Confidential Information becomes aware that the Confidential Information in its possession was
communicated or disclosed to anyone not authorized by paragraphs 14 and 16 of this
Confidentiality Order to receive such information, that person must promptly (a) secure the
return and destruction of all copies of the Discovery Materials containing Confidential
Information from anyone not authorized to receive them, (b) notify counsel of record in writing
upon learning of the unauthorized disclosure, and (c) certify in writing that they will undertake
reasonable care to ensure that the Discovery Materials containing Confidential Information are
maintained in a reasonably secure manner so as to avoid any future unauthorized disclosure of
the Confidential Information.
20. Nothing contained in this Confidentiality Order shall preclude any Party from
using its own documents or information in any manner it sees fit, without prior consent of any
other Party or the Court, unless Plaintiff has retained or produced any documents or information
belonging to Defendants or which Plaintiff was obligated to return to Defendants at the end of
her employment, in which case Plaintiff shall not use those documents or information except for
purposes of litigating this Action as governed by this Confidentiality Order, shall not disclose
those documents or information except to those individuals entitled to disclosure pursuant to this
Confidentiality Order, and shall subsequently destroy or return those documents or information
pursuant to paragraph 23 of this Confidentiality Order.
21. In the event that a Party wishes to use any Discovery Materials designated as
Confidential Information, or any document containing or making reference to the contents of
such Confidential Information, in any pleading or document filed with the Court in this litigation,
such pleading or document and Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only Discovery Material shall
be filed in accordance with the procedures of the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York’s and the Individual Rules and Practices of the Honorable Jesse M. Furman
regarding filing documents under seal and/or with redactions, as applicable.
22. Compliance with this Confidentiality Order shall not be construed in any way as
an admission or agreement by any Party that the designated disclosure constitutes or contains any
proprietary or confidential information of any other Party or witness. No Party to this action
shall be obligated to challenge the propriety of any Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only
designation by any Party, and failure to do so shall not constitute a waiver or in any way
preclude a subsequent challenge in this or any other action to the propriety of such designations.
23. Within thirty (30) days of the final conclusion of this Action, each Party or other
individual subject to this Confidentiality Order shall be under an obligation to assemble and to
return to the originating source all originals and unmarked copies of Discovery Materials
containing Confidential Information and to destroy, should such source so request, all copies of
Discovery Materials containing Confidential Information that contain and/or constitute attorney
work product as well as excerpts, summaries and digests revealing Confidential Information;
provided, however, that counsel may retain complete copies of all court papers, deposition and
trial transcripts, attorney work product, and all exhibits to any of the foregoing that reflect or
contain information designated as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only. To the extent a Party
requests the return of Confidential material from the Court after the final conclusion of this
Action, including the exhaustion of all appeals therefrom and all related proceedings, the Party
shall file a motion seeking such relief.
24. The confidentiality obligations imposed by this Confidentiality Order, and this
Court’s jurisdiction over disputes relating to this Confidentiality Order, shall survive termination
of this Action, and shall remain in full force and effect unless otherwise expressly ordered by the
Court or by the written stipulation of the Parties filed with the Court.
25. Nothing in this Confidentiality Order shall be construed to effect an abrogation,
waiver, or limitation of any kind on the right of the Parties or any nonparty to assert any
applicable privilege.
26. This Confidentiality Order shall not prevent a Party from applying to the Court
for further or additional confidentiality or protective orders.
27. Nothing in this Confidentiality Order shall be deemed to limit, prejudice, or waive
any right of any Party, third party, person, or entity: (a) to resist or compel discovery with respect
to, or to seek to obtain additional or different protection for, material claimed to be protected
work product or privileged under applicable law, material as to which the Party disclosing the
material claims a legal obligation not to disclose, or material not required to be provided
pursuant to applicable law; (b) to seek to modify or obtain relief from any aspect of this
Confidentiality Order; (c) to object to the use, relevance, or admissibility at trial or otherwise of
any material, whether or not designated in whole or in part, as Confidential Information
governed by this Confidentiality Order; or (d) otherwise to require that discovery be conducted
according to governing laws and rules.
STIPULATED AND AGREED TO BY ALL PARTIES:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Dated: October 12, 2021
Se, gle tL
By: By:
David R. Ehrlich Elise M. Bloom
Amanda B. Slutsky Noa M. Baddish
STAGG WABNIK LAW GROUP LLP PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
401 Franklin Avenue, Suite 300 Eleven Times Square
Garden City, New York 11530 New York, New York 10036
dehrlich@staggwabnik.com ebloom@proskauer.com
aslutsky@staggwabnik.com nbaddish@proskauer.com
(516) 812-4550 (212) 960-3000
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants
Karine Travieso Major League Soccer, L.L.C.
JoAnn Neale, and Gary Stevenson
SO ORDERED this dayof October, 2021.
Honorablé Jesse M--Furman, U.S.D.J
This stipulation binds the parties to treat as confidential the documents so classified. This Court,
however, has not reviewed the documents referenced herein; therefore, by so ordering this stipulation, the
Court makes no finding as to whether the documents are confidential. That finding will be made, if ever,
upon a document-by-document review pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Court’s Individual
Rules and Practices and subject to the presumption in favor of public access to “judicial documents.” See
generally Lugosch vy. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). To that end, the
Court does not “so order” any provision to the extent that it purports to authorize the parties to file
documents under seal without a prior court order. See New York ex rel. Khurana v. Spherion Corp., No.
15-CV-6605 (JMF), 2019 WL 3294170 (S.D.N-Y. July 19, 2019).
12
EXHIBIT A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
KARINE TRAVIESO, Case No. 1:21-cv-06998
Plaintiff,
NON-DISCLOSURE
v. AGREEMENT
MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER, L.L.C., and
JOANN NEALE, and GARY
STEVENSON, individually,
Defendants.
I _____________________, acknowledge that I have read and understand the
Confidentiality Order in this action governing the non-disclosure of those portions of Discovery
Material that have been designated as Confidential or Attorneys’ Eyes Only. I agree that I will
not disclose such Discovery Materials to anyone other than for purposes of this litigation and that
at the conclusion of the litigation I will return all discovery information to the Party or attorney
from whom I received it. By acknowledging these obligations under the Confidentiality Order, I
understand that I am submitting myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York for the purpose of any issue or dispute arising hereunder and
that my willful violation of any term of the Confidentiality Order could subject me to
punishment for contempt of Court.
Dated: By:
14