Opinion

McAvoy v. Suffolk County

Court
District Court, E.D. New York
Filed
Feb 1, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 26.6%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2/1/  2021

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

---------------------------------------X

LONG ISLAND OFFICE

MATTHEW JOSEPH MCAVOY,

Plaintiff,

ORDER

-against- 21-CV-0349(JS)(ST)

SUFFOLK COUNTY and SUFFOLK COUNTY JAIL,

Defendants.

---------------------------------------X

APPEARANCES:

For Plaintiff: Matthew Joseph McAvoy, 18-A-2287, pro se

Auburn Correctional Facility

P.O. Box 618

Auburn, New York 13024

For Defendants: No appearances.

SEYBERT, District Judge:

On January 20, 2021, pro se plaintiff Matthew Joseph

McAvoy (“Plaintiff”), who is incarcerated, commenced this action

by filing a Complaint along with an application to proceed in forma

pauperis (“IFP”) and an application for the appointment of pro

bono counsel. (Compl., ECF No. 1; IFP Mot., ECF No. 2; Counsel

Mot., ECF No. 3.) Upon review of Plaintiff’s declaration

submitted in support of his IFP application, the Court finds that

Plaintiff is qualified by his financial status to commence this

action without prepayment of the filing fee. Accordingly,

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.

Pursuant to this Court’s January 23, 2012 Consolidation

Order in Butler, et al. v. DeMarco, et al., No. 11-CV-2602 (JS)(ST)

(E.D.N.Y.) (the “Consolidated Action”), the Court has reviewed the

instant Complaint and finds that it relates to the subject matter

of the Consolidated Action. (Consol. Order, No. 11-CV-2602, ECF

No. 327.) Accordingly, this action shall be consolidated with the

Consolidated Action. This affects Plaintiff in the following

ways:

1. Plaintiff in this action shall become a member of the

certified classes in Butler (No. 11-CV-2602);1

1 The classes are defined as follows:

(1) [A]n Injunctive Class comprised of all

persons who, now or at any time in the future,

are or will be detainees or prisoners in the

custody of the Suffolk County Sheriff=s

Department and housed in the SCCF [Suffolk

County Correctional Facility], with separate

subclasses for those persons detained in

Riverhead and Yaphank; and

(2) [A] Damages Class comprised of all persons

who are or were detainees or prisoners in the

custody of the Suffolk County Sheriff’s

Department and housed in the SCCF and who were

or will be released from the SCCF on or after

April 5, 2009, with separate subclasses for

those persons detained in Riverhead and

Yaphank.

(See Aug. 29, 2016 Order, No. 11-CV-2602, ECF No. 428, at 2-3.)

On August 29, 2016, in the Consolidated Action, this Court adopted

then-Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown’s Report and Recommendation

and granted the Consolidated Action Defendants’ cross motion to

amend the class definitions to “exclude all Suffolk County

Correctional Facility inmates ‘who were or have been housed

exclusively at the new jail facility in Yaphank, New York.’” (Id.

at 3-5.)

2

2. Any claims in the instant Complaint that are not

included in the Consolidated Amended Complaint in Butler

shall be severed (see Consol. Order at 17 (describing

the process for proceeding with any severed claims after

the resolution of the Consolidated Action)); and

3. Plaintiff, as a member of the class, shall be

represented by pro bono counsel, Shearman & Sterling

LLP.2 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s application for the

appointment of pro bono counsel is DENIED as moot.

A copy of the Consolidation Order and the Consolidated Amended

Complaint (the operative Complaint) in Butler are annexed to this

Order.

If Plaintiff does not wish to proceed as a member of the

Consolidated Action, he must inform the Court, in writing, within

thirty (30) days after receiving a copy of this Order. Upon

receipt of such a letter, the Court will direct the Clerk of the

Court to sever this Complaint from the Consolidated Amended

Complaint and reopen and reinstate this individual pro se action.

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s application to

proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED and his

application for the appointment of pro bono counsel (ECF No. 3) is

2 Counsel’s mailing address is:

Daniel Hector Rees LaGuardia

Shearman & Sterling

599 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Counsel’s telephone number is: (212)848-4000.

3

DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CONSOLIDATE

this matter with Butler, et al. v. DeMarco, et al., No. 11-CV-

2602; to mail a copy of this Order, the Order of Consolidation

(No. 11-CV-2602, ECF No. 327), and the Consolidated Amended

Complaint (No. 11-CV-2602, ECF No. 334) to Plaintiff at his last

known address; and to mark this case CLOSED.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)

that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith

and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose

of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-

45 (1962).

SO ORDERED.

_/s/ JOANNA SEYBERT_______

Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J.

Dated: February 1 , 2021

Central Islip, New York

4

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.