Opinion

Dr. Gerald R. Finkel, as Chairman of The Joint Industry Board of The Electrical Industry v. Potenza Electrical Corp.

Court
District Court, E.D. New York
Filed
Jan 14, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 26.5%

The opinion

FILED

IN CLERK'S OFFICE

US DISTRICT COURT E.D.NY.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT te JAN AM 2020 ok

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

EERE Ee TE

; BROOKLYN OFFICE

DR. GERALD R. FINKEL, as Chairman of the Joint *

Industry Board of the Electrical Industry, : .

Pavitioner : MEMORANDUM DECISION

CHNIOHET _ AND ORDER

against - : 19-CV-00486 (AMD) (RML)

POTENZA ELECTRICAL CORP., ef al, :

Respondents. .

eee neneneneneneneeeee OX

M. DONNELLY, United States District Judge:

On January 24, 2019, the petitioner brought this action seeking confirmation of an

arbitration award and asking the Court to award certain additional damages and fees against the

respondents pursuant to section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

1974 (“ERISA”), codified as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3) and section 301 of the Labor

Management Relations Act of 1947, codified as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185. (ECF Nos. 1, 4.)

Neither respondent answered or otherwise moved with respect to the petition.

On March 1, 2019, I referred the petition to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy for a report

and recommendation. On March 4, 2019, the petitioner moved for summary judgment on the

unopposed petition. (ECF No. 10.) On November 26, 2019, Judge Levy recommended that I

grant the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and confirm the award. (ECF No. 12.)

Judge Levy also recommended that damages be awarded as set forth in his report and

recommendation. (/d.) No objections have been filed to the report and recommendation, and

the time for doing so has passed.

A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To accept those

portions of the report and recommendation to which no timely objection has been made, “a

district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Jarvis

v. N. Am. Globex Fund L.P., 823 F. Supp. 2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (internal quotation

omitted).

I have reviewed Magistrate Judge Levy’s thoughtful report and recommendation and find

no error. Accordingly, I adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety and order that the

arbitration award be confirmed and that damages be awarded as set forth therein, for a total

judgment of $555,353.79:

(1) Respondent Potenza Electrical Corp. be held liable for the total award amount of

$552,570.29, plus pre-judgment interest on the unpaid contributions accruing at a

rate of $61.54 per day from the date of the award through the date of entry of

judgment, attorney’s fees of $2,308.50, and costs of $475: and

(2) Respondent Michael Tarantino be held jointly and severally liable with Potenza for

$5,534.63 of the total award amount.

SO ORDERED.

s/Ann M. Donnelly

AnnM Donnelly

United States District Judge

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

January 13, 2020

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.