The opinion
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAR 27 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
In re: BRANDON ADAMS. No. 24-936 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
____________________________
D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01923-CDS-MDC
District of Nevada,
BRANDON ADAMS, Las Vegas
ORDER
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS
VEGAS,
Respondent,
ELIZABETH BROWN; RORY WUNSCH,
Real Parties in Interest.
Before: FRIEDLAND, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the
extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir.
2021) (“To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh
the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.”); Bauman v.
U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition for a writ
of mandamus, as supplemented, is denied.
No further filings will be entertained in this closed case.
DENIED.