The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8 * * *
9 JAMES E. COHAN, Case No. 2:20-cv-01187-RFB-EJY
10 Plaintiff,
ORDER
11
v.
12
JUDGE BROWN, LAS VEGAS
13 MUNICIPAL COURT, et al.,
14 Defendants.
15
16 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] of the
17 Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered March 28, 2022.
18 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
19 recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific
20 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. §
21 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is
22 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed
23 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local
24 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct
25 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge.
26 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due
27 by April 11, 2022. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case
28 and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] 1s
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure
4| to comply with the Court’s November 15, 2021 Order.
5
6 DATED: May 6, 2022.
g RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
9 United States District Judge
10
1]
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-