The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6193
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
COREY BROWN,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-00005-H-2)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 29, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corey Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A.
Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Corey Brown appeals the district court’s order denying
his 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown,
No. 4:00-cr-00005-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 22, 2009; entered
Jan. 23, 2009). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th
Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2