Opinion

Brown v. Harrison

Court
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Filed
Jun 5, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 24.5%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

NORTHERN DIVISION

ANTHONY RAHSHAD BROWN, #13710-003 PETITIONER

V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-CV-495-KHJ-MTP

C. HARRISON RESPONDENT

ORDER

Before the Court is the [19] Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of United

States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker. The Report recommends granting

Respondent C. Harrison’s [17] Motion to Dismiss for Mootness and dismissing

Petitioner Anthony Rahshad Brown’s [1] Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without

prejudice. [19] at 2. Written objections to the Report were due May 30, 2023. at

2–3. The Report notified the parties that failure to file written objections to the

findings and recommendations by that date would bar further appeal in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636. .

When no party has objected to a magistrate judge’s Report, the Court need

not review it de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Instead, the Report is reviewed under

the “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review.

, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).

Brown seeks habeas relief, asking the Court to order the Bureau of Prisons to

update his risk level and apply certain “earned time credits” under the First Step

Act. [1] at 2; [1-1] at 3. He filed his [1] Petition on August 25, 2022. Harrison moved

to dismiss, arguing the Petition is moot because he has already received his

requested relief through the BOP’s administrative process. [17] ¶¶ 5–7. The Court

ordered Brown to show cause by May 9, 2023, as to why it should not dismiss the

case as moot. Order [18]. Brown failed to respond.

The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the [1] Petition without

prejudice because it is moot. [19] at 2. Brown did not object to the Report, and the

time to do so has passed. The Report is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to

law.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [19] Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael T. Parker is adopted

as the opinion of this Court. The Court GRANTS Respondent C. Harrison’s [17]

Motion to Dismiss for Mootness and DISMISSES Petitioner Anthony Rahshad

Brown’s [1] Petition without prejudice.

The Court will issue a separate Final Judgment consistent with this Order.

SO ORDERED, this the 5th day of June, 2023.

s/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.