The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JOHN BOWMAN, et al., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) Case No. 4:21-CV-1406 NAB
)
ROBERT L. CHAMBERS, et al., )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Movants’ motion to consolidate this action with Becky
Arps, et al. v. Robert L. Chambers, et al., Cause Number 4:21-cv-1410-HEA. (Doc. 10.) Movants
are the Plaintiffs in the Arps matter: Becky Arps, Rene Artman, Adam Bohn, Tim Fitch, Mark
Harder, Lisa Kaliski, Kelly Stavros, Ernie Trakas, and Richard Wolfe (“Movants” or “the Arps
Plaintiffs”). All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).1 (Doc. 11.) Because these cases involve the same
parties and factual and legal issues, the motion to consolidate will be granted.
Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs consolidation of cases and
provides as follows:
When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the
court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all of the matters in issue in the
actions; it may order all the actions consolidated; and it may make such orders
concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). The Court has broad discretion to order consolidation. See Enterprise Bank
v. Saettle, 21 F.3d 233, 235 (8th Cir. 1994). The threshold issue is whether the proceedings involve
a common party and common issues of fact or law. Id.
1 On December 10, 2021, the Arps Plaintiffs proactively submitted their consent to the undersigned’s jurisdiction.
Both the Bowman case and the Arps case stem from the St. Louis County Council
Reapportionment Commission’s (“Reapportionment Commission”) failure to adopt or file a plan
to reapportion the boundaries of the St. Louis County Council districts (the “Districts”) prior to
their deadline on November 28, 2021. Plaintiffs John Bowman, Karen Cloyd, Glenn Koenen,
Susan Meredith, Tommie Pierson, Jr., Dana Sandweiss, and Brian Wingbermuehle (collectively
“the Bowman Plaintiffs”) are registered voters from all seven Council Districts in St. Louis
County. On November 30, 2021, the Bowman Plaintiffs filed a Complaint for declaratory
judgment against the members of the St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners
(“Board”) in their official capacity. The Bowman Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the current
Council Districts are unequal in population and violate constitutional requirements. They also
request that the Court reapportion and redraw the Council Districts as soon as practicable and
before candidacy filing opens on February 22, 2022.
The Arps Plaintiffs are also registered voters in St. Louis County, and some are members
of the Reapportionment Commission or elected representatives in their respective Council
Districts. On November 30, 2021, the Arps Plaintiffs also filed a Complaint for declaratory
judgment against the members of the St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners in their
official capacity. The three counts in their original Complaint are for declaratory judgment,
application of the Voting Rights Act, and enforcement of constitutional protections. On December
10, 2021, the Arps Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint, adding an additional claim
against John Doe Defendants 1 through 20 for conspiracy to interfere with civil rights.
The plaintiffs seek overlapping relief against the same Defendants, with the exception of
the Arps Plaintiffs’ conspiracy claim against the John Doe Defendants. Defendants consent to the
consolidation of the cases. (Doc. 14.) The Bowman Plaintiffs do not object to the consolidation as
long as the Arps Plaintiffs file their submission as to whether they consent to the jurisdiction of a
Magistrate Judge within twenty-four hours after the granting of the motion for consolidation.
Plaintiffs explain that this request is to ensure there is not unnecessary delay in scheduling trial
and other proceedings as the case moves forward. The Arps Plaintiffs have complied with this
request.2
In light of the circumstances, the Court finds that consolidation of the two proceedings will
serve the interests of convenience and economy in administration and avoid unnecessary cost or
delay.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Arps Plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate is
GRANTED. (Doc. 10.)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is consolidated with Becky Arps, et al. v.
Robert L. Chambers, et al., Cause Number 4:21-cv-1410, for all purposes.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that from this date forward all papers shall be filed in this
case only, that no further pleadings or papers be filed in Cause Number 4:21-cv-1410 and that
Cause Number 4:21-cv-1410 is administratively closed.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that a status and scheduling conference will be held on
Monday, December 20, 2021, at 2:30 pm. The conference will take place via Zoom. Participants
will receive a separate email with a link to join the hearing by Zoom. Members of the general
public who wish to listen in to the hearing are directed to call one of the following numbers to
participate by phone: 1-669-254-5252, Meeting ID: 161 697 3358, Password: 498004. Pursuant to
2 After the Bowman Plaintiffs filed their response requesting that the Arps Plaintiffs consent to the undersigned’s
jurisdiction, the Arps Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint in Cause No. 4:21-cv-1410 adding John Doe
Defendants. Upon consolidation, the undersigned will still not have full consent of all parties, as the Court is unable
to obtain consent from John Doe Defendants.
Local Rule 13.02, all means of photographing, recording, broadcasting, and televising are
prohibited in any courtroom, and in areas adjacent to any courtroom, except when authorized by
the presiding judge. This includes proceedings ordered by the Court to be conducted by phone or
video.
Tesh [SA _
NANNETTE A. BAKER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated this 14th day of December, 2021.