Opinion

Belton v. Chester Lancaster Disabilities & Special Needs Board, Inc.

  • 234 F. App'x 173
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jul 27, 2007
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Wilkinson, Traxler, Duncan
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1221

LYNDA BELTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHESTER LANCASTER DISABILITIES AND SPECIAL

NEEDS BOARD, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(0:05-cv-01649-MBS)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 27, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynda Belton, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, Reyburn Williams

Lominack, III, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lynda Belton appeals the district court’s order adopting

the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting

defendant’s summary judgment motion on her racial discrimination

and harassment claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17

(2000), and dismissing without prejudice her state law claims for

breach of contract, breach of contract with fraudulent means, and

wrongful discharge. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Belton v. Chester Lancaster Disabilities

and Special Needs Bd., Inc., No. 0:05-cv-01649-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 14,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.