The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DAVID BROWN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 21-cv-11565
v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
SUSAN MCCAULEY, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________________________________________________/
ORDER RESOLVING (1) DEFENDANT DONALD HAIDERER’S OBJECTIONS
(ECF No. 68) TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 66) AND (2)
PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF Nos. 58, 60)
Plaintiff David Brown is a prisoner currently under the custody of the Michigan
Department of Corrections (“MDOC”). In this civil action, Brown alleges, among other
things, that he received inadequate medical treatment while he was incarcerated in the
Saginaw Correctional Facility (“SCF”) in 2021. He claims that Defendants Donald
Haiderer (an optometrist who works at SCF) and Susan McCauley (the Healthcare Unit
Manager at SCF) violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment, the Americans with
Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”), and the Rehabilitation Act, 29
U.S.C. § 794 et seq. (the “RA”). The parties dispute whether Brown’s allegations also
include a First Amendment claim of retaliation against Haiderer and McCauley.
On January 26, 2023, Dr. Haiderer moved for summary judgment on Brown’s
claims against him. (See Haiderer Mot., ECF No. 58.) A day later, McCauley also moved
for summary judgment. (See McCauley Mot., ECF No. 60.) On March 15, 2023, the
assigned Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (the “R & R”), in which
she recommended that the Court deny Haiderer’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to
Brown’s Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference claim and his First Amendment
Retaliation claim, but grant the motion as to all other claims against Haiderer. (See R & R,
ECF No. 66.) She further recommended that the Court grant McCauley’s motion and enter
judgment in her favor on all claims against her. (See id.) Haiderer filed Objections to the
R & R on March 29, 2023. (See Obj., ECF No. 68.) Brown has not filed any Objections to
the portions of the R & R that are adverse to him.
On July 10, 2023, the Court held a hearing on Haiderer’s Objections to the R & R.
For the reasons explained on the record during that hearing, the Court rules as follows:
Haiderer’s Objections (ECF No. 68) are OVERRULED IN PART and
SUSTAINED IN PART. The Objections are OVERRULED to the extent that
Haiderer objects to the recommendation that the Court deny his motion for summary
judgment on Brown’s Eighth Amendment claim. That portion of Haiderer’s motion
(ECF No. 58) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Haiderer’s ability to renew
the motion following settlement efforts. The Objections are SUSTAINED to the
extent that Haiderer contends that he has not waived his right to challenge Brown’s
First Amendment retaliation claim (and/or to argue that Brown has not brought such
a claim). Haiderer may move for summary judgment on the First Amendment
retaliation claim (and may argue in that motion that Brown has not brought such a
claim) following settlement efforts.
Defendant Haiderer’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58) is GRANTED
to the extent that Dr. Haiderer seeks judgment in his favor on Brown’s claims under
the ADA and the RA. Brown did not file any objections to the recommendation in
the R & R that judgment be entered against Brown on these claims, and the Court
has no duty to conduct an independent review of the portions of the R & R to which
the parties did not object. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
As further explained on the record, Defendant McCauley’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(ECF No. 60) is GRANTED.
Finally, for the reasons discussed on the record, the Court will appoint counsel for
the limited purpose of representing and advising Brown in settlement negotiations. If those
settlement efforts are unsuccessful, Dr. Haiderer will be permitted to file a renewed motion
for summary judgment as described above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 12, 2023
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or
counsel of record on July 12, 2023, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Ryan
Case Manager
(313) 234-5126