The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
RORY CONRAD * CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS * NO. 23-3599
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY * SECTION “I” (2)
COMPANY
ORDER AND REASONS
Pending before me is Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company’s Motion to Opt-
Out of Hurricane Ida Streamlined Settlement Program. ECF No. 27. As of this date, Plaintiff has
not filed an Opposition Memorandum, and the deadline for same expired on Tuesday, February
27, 2024. See E.D. La. L.R. 7.5.
Having considered the record, the submissions and arguments of counsel, and the
applicable law, Defendant’s Motion to Opt-Out (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART for the reasons stated herein.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Rory Conrad filed suit against Defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
seeking to recover for losses incurred as a result of Hurricane Ida, as well as extra-contractual
damages. ECF No. 1. Defendant initially filed its Motion to Dismiss on December 12, 2023 but
later withdrew that motion. See ECF Nos. 11, 15-16. Thereafter, Defendant sought an extension
of time to file a responsive pleading, which motion the district court ultimately denied on February
9, 2024. ECF Nos. 17, 19, 20, 24. Defendant re-filed its Motion to Dismiss on February 15, 2024
and now seeks to opt-out of the Hurricane Ida Streamlined Settlement Program (“SSP”) in order
to pursue the dispositive motion, in which it seeks dismissal on the basis that Plaintiff is not a
named or additional insured under the policy of insurance. ECF No. 27-2 at 1-2.
II. APPLICABLE LAW AND ANALYSIS
On August 26, 2022, this Court adopted CMO No. 1 to govern Hurricane Ida claims. CMO
#1 includes provisions for certain mandatory initial disclosures as well as a streamlined settlement
program (“SSP”) that requires parties to engage in informal settlement conferences as well as
court-ordered mediation. See Sections 1, 3. Although parties may generally not opt out of the
mandatory initial disclosures set forth in Section 1, within 15 days of the responsive pleading or
entry of the CMO, a party may seek to opt-out of the SSP in Section 3 upon a showing of good
cause. See Section 3.
Although Defendant failed to seek leave to opt-out of the SSP within fifteen days of filing
its initial responsive pleading, as recently explained by Chief Judge Brown, the court adopted the
Hurricane Ida CMO to facilitate the speedy and orderly resolution of insurance cases arising out
of Hurricane Ida through the SSP.1 Requiring the parties to proceed with the SSP when the
plaintiff is alleged to have no viable claim because he is not a named insured or third party
beneficiary hinders the efficient resolution of this matter and thus would be contrary to the goals
of the CMO.2 District judges on our court have granted delinquent motions to opt-out when same
promotes the efficient administration of justice.3 Accordingly, Defendant’s request to opt-out of
the CMO is granted, but only for the limited purpose of filing their dispositive motion. The parties
remain obliged to comply with all other terms of the CMO unless or until the matter is resolved
on Defendant’s motion or otherwise.
1 Okpalobi v. American Nat’l Prop. & Cas. Co., No. 23-6691, 2024 WL 838464, at *9 (E.D. La. Feb. 28, 2024).
2 Id.
3 Id. (citations omitted).
I. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Defendant is granted limited relief from the CMO, solely for
purposes of pursuing its Motion to Dismiss on the basis of whether Plaintiff is a named or
additional insured under the governing policy. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Opt Out of the Streamlined Settlement
Program (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant is granted
limited relief from the CMO’s automatic stay solely to enable it to pursue its motion to dismiss as
set forth herein. Ifthe motion is denied or the case otherwise remains on the docket, it will remain
subject to the Hurricane Ida CMO and the Streamlined Settlement Program.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 6th day of March, 2024.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE