Opinion

Swindler v. Social Security Administration

Court
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Filed
Dec 22, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 22.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

LEON E. SWINDLER CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS CASE NO. 23-837

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER SECTION: “G”

OF SOCIAL SECURITY

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Leon E. Swindler’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees.1 Plaintiff

requests attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,690.002 pursuant to the provisions of the Equal Access

to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi, the Action Commissioner of Social

Security, does not oppose the motion. 3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Leon E. Swindler is awarded attorney fees

under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $4,690.00.

Full or partial remittance of the awarded attorney fees will be contingent upon a

determination by the government that Plaintiff owes no qualifying, pre-existing debt(s) to the

government. If such a debt(s) exits, the government will reduce the awarded attorney fees in this

Order to the extent necessary to satisfy such debt(s).

1 Rec. Doc. 17.

2 Plaintiff seeks payment for 26.8 attorney hours of attorney work at the rate of $175 per hour.

3 Rec. Doc. 19.

If the fees are not subject to any offset and an assignment is provided to the Social Security

Administration, the award may be paid directly to the order of Jeff Nicholson, Esquire.* All checks

will be sent care of Plaintiff's attorney Jeff Nicholson, Esquire at P.O. Box 40516, Baton Rouge,

Louisiana 70835.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 21st of December, 2023.

NANNETTE J 2G ETTE BROWN

CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). “[A] § 2412(d) fees award is payable to the litigant and is

therefore subject to a Government offset to satisfy a pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the United States.” Id. at

589. The Supreme Court recognized that historically the Commissioner paid EAJA fees directly to a prevailing

plaintiff's attorney. Id. at 597 The Court further noted “the Government has since continued the direct payment practice

only in cases where the plaintiff does not owe a debt to the [G]overnment and assigns the right to receive the fees to

the attorney.” Jd. (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.