Opinion

Paz v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.

Court
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Filed
Apr 5, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 22.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

CEZAR PAZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND CIVIL ACTION

ON BEHALF OF HIS MINOR CHILDREN,

C.P., JR., L.P., AND K.P.,

Plaintiff

VERSUS NO. 17-4557

BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION SECTION: “E” (4)

INC., ET AL.,

Defendants

ORDER AND REASONS

Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by BP Exploration &

Production Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services,

Inc., Transocean Holdings, LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore

Deepwater Drilling, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”)1 against Cezar Paz, individually and

on behalf of his minor children, C.P., Jr., L.P., and K.P. (“Plaintiff”). The motion was filed

on March 28, 2023.2 Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due on April 4, 2023.3 As of

the date of this Order and Reasons, no opposition to the instant motion has been filed,

and Plaintiff has not moved for an extension of his deadline to file an opposition brief.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is, therefore, unopposed. Although this

dispositive motion is unopposed, summary judgment is not automatic, and the Court

must determine whether Defendants have shown they are entitled to judgment as a

matter of law.4

1 R. Doc. 42. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings, LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc.,

and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. joined in the motion for summary judgment filed by BP

Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, and BP p.l.c. Id. at p. 1 n.1.

2 Id.

3 R. Doc. 42-7.

4 See, e.g., Johnson v. Pettiford, 442 F.3d 917, 918 (5th Cir. 2006); FED. R. CIV. P. 56(a).

Defendants’ instant motion is nearly identical to the one filed by Defendants, and

granted by this Court, in other B3 cases.5

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in the cited B3

cases;

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment® is GRANTED.

Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP

America Production Company, BP p.|.c., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean

Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore Deepwater

Drilling, Inc. and against Plaintiff Cezar Paz, individually and on behalf of his minor

children, C.P., Jr., L.P., and K.P., on all claims.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 5th day of April, 2023.

SUSIE tonga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5 See Davis v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Civ. A. 17-3141 at R. Doc. 48 (E.D. La. 7/5/22)

(Morgan, J.); see also Brown v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Civ. A. 17-3101 at R. Doc. 59

(E.D. La. 11/18/22) (Morgan, J.).

®R. Doc. 42.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.