Opinion

Swenson v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Company

Court
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Filed
Mar 7, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 22.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

SIGMUND SWENSON et al. CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS CASE NO. 22-1901

UNITED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY SECTION: “G”(1)

INSURANCE CO. et al.

ORDER

This litigation arises from an insurance coverage dispute related to Hurricane Ida. The

Court has received notice that Defendant Family Security Insurance Co., Inc. has been placed into

liquidation.1 The Fifth Circuit has recognized that “insolvent insurers are subject to the

comprehensive oversight of state administrative agencies and courts” and “[f]ederal law consigns

to the states the primary responsibility for regulating the insurance industry.”2 Accordingly, the

Fifth Circuit has held that “allowing a creditor or claimant to proceed against an insolvent insurer

in federal court while a state insolvency proceeding is pending would usurp [the state’s] control

over the liquidation proceeding by allowing [the claimant] to preempt others in the distribution of

[the insurance company’s] assets.”3 Such a statutory scheme exists in Louisiana. Under Louisiana

law, “[a]ll proceedings in which the insolvent insurer is a party or is obligated to defend a party in

any court in this state shall be stayed for six months.”4 Thus, this Court has authority under

1 See, e.g., No. 22-4243, Rec. Doc. 13.

2 Clark v. Fitzgibbons, 105 F.3d 1049, 1051 (5th Cir. 1997) (citing the McCarran–Ferguson Act).

3 Id. (internal citation and quotation omitted).

4 La. Rev. Stat. § 22:2068(A).

1

Louisiana law to stay this matter for six months sua sponte due to Defendant’s insolvency.

In light of Louisiana’s comprehensive statutory scheme for regulating insolvent insurers

and Fifth Circuit precedent admonishing courts to avoid interfering with state administrative

processes involving insolvent insurers, the Court exercises its discretion to stay the claims pending

against Defendant for a period of six months.°

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is STAYED AND

ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED for a period of six months. The case shall be reopened upon

a motion of a party at the conclusion of the six-month period.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 6th day of March, 2023.

NANNETTE JOLI TE BROWN

CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5 See Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.