Opinion

Garsh v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Court
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Filed
Mar 7, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 22.4%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

MATTHEW GARSH et al. CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS CASE NO. 23-274

UNITED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY SECTION: “G”(2)

INSURANCE CO.

ORDER

This litigation arises from an insurance coverage dispute related to Hurricane Ida. The

Court has received notice that Defendant United Property and Casualty Insurance Company

(“Defendant”) has been placed into liquidation.1

The Fifth Circuit has recognized that “insolvent insurers are subject to the comprehensive

oversight of state administrative agencies and courts” and “[f]ederal law consigns to the states the

primary responsibility for regulating the insurance industry.”2 Accordingly, the Fifth Circuit has

held that “allowing a creditor or claimant to proceed against an insolvent insurer in federal court

while a state insolvency proceeding is pending would usurp [the state’s] control over the

liquidation proceeding by allowing [the claimant] to preempt others in the distribution of [the

insurance company’s] assets.”3 Such a statutory scheme exists in Louisiana. Under Louisiana law,

“[a]ll proceedings in which the insolvent insurer is a party or is obligated to defend a party in any

1 Rec. Doc. 9.

2 Clark v. Fitzgibbons, 105 F.3d 1049, 1051 (5th Cir. 1997) (citing the McCarran–Ferguson Act).

3 Id. (internal citation and quotation omitted).

1

court in this state shall be stayed for six months.”* Thus, this Court has authority under Louisiana

law to stay this matter for six months sua sponte due to Defendant’s insolvency.

In light of Louisiana’s comprehensive statutory scheme for regulating insolvent insurers

and Fifth Circuit precedent admonishing courts to avoid interfering with state administrative

processes involving insolvent insurers, the Court exercises its discretion to stay the claims pending

against Defendant for a period of six months.°

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is STAYED AND

ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED for a period of six months. The case shall be reopened upon

a motion of a party at the conclusion of the six-month period.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this (6th day of March, 2023.

NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN

CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 La. Rev. Stat. § 22:2068(A).

5 See Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.