The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ALLIED TRUST INSURANCE CO. CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS CASE NO. 22-2161
EDDIE MOSES, III SECTION: “G”(1)
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant Eddie Moses, III’s (“Defendant”) “Motion to Dismiss as
Moot under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1).”1 This litigation arises over a dispute between an insurance
company, Plaintiff Allied Trust Insurance Co. (“Plaintiff”), and its policyholder, Defendant, over
the extent of the damage to Defendant’s property during Hurricane Ida.2 Plaintiff filed a Complaint
in this Court for a declaratory judgment that: (1) the appraisal provisions in the subject insurance
policy and contract between the parties is clear and unambiguous; (2) Defendant is required by
those provisions to participate in the appraisal process (the “Appraisal”); (3) as part of the
Appraisal, Defendant is specifically required to name a competent, impartial, and disinterested
appraiser who is registered with the Louisiana Department of Insurance; (4) an appraisal umpire
must also be selected by this Court; and (5) the Appraisal must be completed as to all coverages.3
In the motion, Defendant argues that the Complaint should be dismissed as moot because
Defendant agrees to the Appraisal.4 On August 30, 2022, Plaintiff opposed the motion because the
1 Rec. Doc. 10.
2 See Rec. Doc. 1 at 2.
3 See Rec. Doc. 1 at 6.
4 Rec. Doc. 10-1 at 2.
Appraisal was not complete and Defendant had been non-compliant.5 Plaintiff also argued that
Defendant’s Counterclaim6 invokes this Court’s jurisdiction.7 On September 16, 2022, Defendant
filed a reply stating that “the appraisal process was officially completed”8 and attaching a copy of
the signed and binding appraisal award.9
An action should be dismissed as moot pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(1) “when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a cognizable interest in
the outcome.”10 “[A]n actual controversy must exist not only at the time the complaint is filed, but
through all stages of the litigation.”11 Thus, where “an intervening circumstance deprives the
plaintiff of a ‘personal stake in the outcome of the lawsuit []’ at any point during litigation, the
action can no longer proceed and must be dismissed as moot.”12 A case becomes moot if the
following conditions are satisfied: “(1) it can be said with assurance that “there is no reasonable
expectation . . .” that the alleged violation will recur, and (2) interim relief or events have
completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged violation.”13
Defendant represents that “the appraisal process was officially completed, resulting in a
5 Rec. Doc. 13 at 4.
6 Rec. Doc. 7.
7 Rec. Doc. 13 at 5.
8 Rec. Doc. 23 at 2.
9 Rec. Doc. 23-1.
10 Los Angeles Cty. v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979) (quoting Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 498
(1969)).
11 Kingdomware Techs., Inc. v. United States, 579 U.S. 162, (2016) (quoting Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.,
569 U.S. 85, 90-91 (2013)).
12 Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, 577 U.S. 153, 161 (2016) (quoting Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk,
569 U.S. 66, 72 (2013)).
13 Los Angeles Cty., 440 U.S. at 631 (quoting United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 633 (1953)).
binding appraisal award being entered and signed by both parties’ appraisers establishing
definitively the amount of the covered loss in this case as to all coverages.” Defendant also
provides the Court with an official appraisal signed by both the Plaintiff's appraiser and the
Defendant’s appraiser. Considering this “interim event,” the Court does not see how the alleged
violation of Defendant refusing to participate in the Appraisal could recur and finds the effects of
the alleged violation to be completely and irrevocably eradicated.!° Thus, the Court finds that
Plaintiff's claims should be dismissed as moot pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(1).!° Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion” is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims of Plaintiff against Defendant are
DISMISSED as MOOT pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this 19th day of September, 2022.
NANNETTEAOLIVETTE BROWN
CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4 Rec. Doc. 23 at 2.
'5 See Los Angeles Cty., 440 U.S. at 631.
16 See Allied Trust Insurance Co. vy. Hensley, 22-cv-2084 (E.D. La. Aug. 31, 2022).
Rec. Doc. 10.