Opinion

Dixon v. US Bank

Court
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Filed
Apr 28, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 22.3%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

LANDRY DIXON CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 21-1924

U.S. BANK, et al. SECTION: M (3)

ORDER & REASONS

On March 30, 2022, defendants U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) and

various officers and members of its board of directors, namely, Andy Cecere, Warner L. Baxter,

Elizabeth L. Buse, Kimberly N. Ellison-Taylor, Chris Taylor, Dorothy J. Bridges, Kimberly J.

Harris, and Roland A. Hernandez (collectively, “Defendants”), filed a motion to dismiss under

Rules 8, 9(b), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to plead a

claim, failure to plead fraud with specificity, and improper service on the individual defendants.1

The motion was set for submission on May 5, 2022.2 Local Rule 7.5 of the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana requires that a memorandum in opposition to a motion

must be filed no later than eight days before the noticed submission date, which deadline in this

instance was April 27, 2022. The Court notes that plaintiff Landry Dixon is proceeding pro se.

Although the Court construes pro se filing liberally, pro se parties are still required to “abide by

the rules that govern the federal courts.” EEOC v. Simbaki, Ltd., 767 F.3d 475, 484 (5th Cir.

2014). Dixon has not filed a memorandum in opposition to Defendants’ motion.

Accordingly, because the motion to dismiss is unopposed and appears to have merit,3

1 R. Doc. 11.

2 R. Doc. 11-2.

3 Dixon appears to allege that U.S. Bank mishandled his accounts. However, the complaint is vague,

rambling, and fails to identify, with any context, the claims it purports to assert. In sum, Dixon’s complaint does not

comply with Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which requires a short, plain statement of the claim

showing that the plaintiff is entitled to relief, or Rule 9(b) which requires fraud to be pleaded with particularity.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the complaint is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 28th day of April, 2022.

________________________________

BARRY W. ASHE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.