The opinion
MINUTE ENTRY
CURRAULT, M. J.
JUNE 21, 2021
MJSTAR 0:24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
GREAT LAKES INSURANCE, S.E. □□ CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS □□ NO. 20-2795
GRAY GROUP INVESTMENTS, LLC □□ SECTION “R” (2)
ORDER AND REASONS
Oral argument was conducted in person on Plaintiff Great Lakes Insurance, S.E.’s Motion
for Reconsideration (ECF No. 62) of its Motion to Compel (ECF No. 46), resolved by my Order
and Reasons (ECF No. 60), and for which Plaintiff requested oral argument. ECF Nos. 64, 68.
Defendant Gray Group Investments, LLC opposed the motion. ECF No. 67.
Participating were: Todd G. Crawford for Plaintiff;
Michael H. Bagot Jr. for Defendant
Other than its disagreement with my prior decision, Plaintiff has not established any
independent reason for reconsideration. Plaintiff has not identified newly discovered evidence
or new argument that was not or could not have been urged previously, nor has it established any
manifest error of law or fact or intervening change in the law.! Accordingly, considering the
record, the oral and written arguments and representations of counsel, and the applicable law, for
these reasons and as those more fully stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (ECE No. 62) is DENIED.
oD aedaby SCURRAULT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
See Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, 303 F.3d 571, 581 (5th Cir. 2002) (citations omitted); Browning v.
Navarro, 894 F.2d 99, 100 (Sth Cir. 1990) (citations omitted); Simon v. United States, F.2d 1154, 1159 (Sth Cir.
1990); Waltman v. Int'l Paper Co.,875 F.2d 468, 473 (Sth Cir. 1989).