Opinion

Ballentine v. Virginia Parole Board

  • 141 F. App'x 214
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 24, 2005
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Widener, Williams, Michael
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6336

JOHN FREDERICK BALLENTINE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (CA-04-537-3)

Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 24, 2005

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Frederick Ballentine, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

John Frederick Ballentine appeals the district court’s

order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation to deny relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and a subsequent order

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Ballentine v.

Virginia Parole Bd., No. CA-04-537-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2004 & Jan.

26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.