The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6831
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAY R. BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CR-01-275)
Submitted: December 15, 2004 Decided: January 13, 2005
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay R. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jay R. Brown appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify the terms of his supervised release.
A district court’s imposition of special conditions of supervised
release is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v.
Dotson, 324 F.3d 256, 259 (4th Cir. 2003). We have reviewed the
record and find that the district court’s refusal to modify the
terms of Brown’s supervised release was a proper exercise of
discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district
court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -