Opinion

Jernazian v. City Of Miami-Planning Department

Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
May 11, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.2%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 23-cv-21766-BLOOM

TASH JERNAZIAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI – PLANNING DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

_________________ /

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. On May 11,

2023, Plaintiff Tash Jernazian docketed a Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights, ECF No. [1]

(“Complaint”). As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not paid the $402 filing fee ($350 + $52

administrative fee) or filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

“Parties instituting a civil action are required to pay filing fees[.]” Castro v. Director,

F.D.I.C., 449 F. App’x 786, 788 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), (c)). Plaintiffs who

cannot pay the filing fee may file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis to proceed with

their action without initial payment of the fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Section 1915 requires that

plaintiffs file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by “an affidavit that

includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees

or give security therefor. Such affidavit shall state the nature of the action, defense or appeal and

affiant’s belief that the person is entitled to redress.” Id. at (a)(1). “Despite the statute's use of the

phrase ‘prisoner possesses,’ the affidavit requirement applies to all persons requesting leave to

proceed IFP.” Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc., 364 F.3d 1305, 1306 n.1 (11th Cir. 2004) (citation

Case No. 23-cv-21766-BLOOM

omitted).

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), a district court may dismiss a complaint

for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order or the federal rules. See Brown v.

Blackwater River Corr. Facility, 762 F. App’x 982, 985 (11th Cir. 2019) (“[A] district court may

sua sponte dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with an order.”). Because

Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a supporting

financial affidavit, the Complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED

without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case and all pending motions are

DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on May 11, 2023.

BETHBLOOM i ists

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Tash Jernazian

3601 NW Ist Ave., Unit C

Miami, FL 33137

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.