Opinion

Castro v. United States

Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
May 28, 2021
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 20.1%

The opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 4:19-cv-10032-KMM-1

LEIMER PEREZ CASTRO,

Movant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

/

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon pro se Movant Leimer Perez Castro’s

(“Movant”) Amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence

by a Person in Federal Custody. (“Am. Mot.”) (ECF No. 30). The Court referred the matter to the

Honorable Lisette M. Reid, United States Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and

Recommendation recommending that the Amended Motion be DENIED. (“R&R”) (ECF No. 37).

Movant did not file objections and the time to do so has passed. The matter is now ripe for review.

As set forth below, the Court ADOPTS the R&R.1

The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

On May 7, 2018, Movant pled guilty to one count of conspiracy with intent to distribute

five (5) kilograms or more of cocaine while on board a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the

United States, in violation of 46 U.S.C. §§ 70503(a)(1) and 70506(b). (CR-ECF Nos. 20, 25).2

On July 9, 2018, Movant was sentenced to a total term of 168 months’ imprisonment, to be

followed by a term of five (5) years of supervised release. (CR-ECF Nos. 44, 47). On February

1 The Court adopts the R&R with the following alteration: on page eight, line seventeen, the

citation should read: “Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985).”

2 References to Movant’s criminal case, United States v. Castro, et al., 4:18-cr-10010-KMM-1,

are notated as “CR-ECF No. __”.

22, 2019, Movant filed his first Motion Under § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence

by a Person in Federal Custody. (ECF No 1). Movant filed several amendments thereafter,

resulting in the filing of the final Amended Motion on July 23, 2019. Am. Mot. Therein, Movant

asserts the following ineffective assistance of counsel claims: (1) counsel failed to file a pretrial

motion to dismiss based on a delay in presentment for Movant’s initial appearance; (2) counsel

failed to file a motion to suppress the field test which came back positive for drugs; (3) counsel

permitted Movant to admit, as part of the negotiated plea agreement, that he was the “master” of

the vessel he was arrested on; (4) counsel failed to object to the quantity of drugs attributable to

Movant at sentencing; and (5) counsel failed to seek a hearing or otherwise require that the

Government file a motion for reduction in sentence based on Movant’s cooperation.3 See

generally id.; Reply (ECF No. 36).

As set forth in the R&R, Magistrate Judge Reid recommends that the Motion be denied on

the merits. R&R at 18. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that as to each of Movant’s

ineffective assistance of counsel claims, Movant fails to demonstrate deficiency or prejudice under

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 694 (1984). Id. at 8–17. First, Magistrate Judge

Reid finds that Movant has not demonstrated that the fifteen (15) day delay between his search

and seizure on the high seas and his presentment before a magistrate judge was unreasonable. Id.

at 10–12. Second, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that Movant has not demonstrated that challenging

the nature or quantity of the drugs would have resulted in a finding that the total amount of cocaine

seized aboard the vessel was less than the amount that guided Movant’s base sentencing level—

450 kilograms, when in fact Movant agreed to be held accountable for 1,120 kilograms as part of

3 The fifth claim, that Movant’s counsel failed to seek a reduction in Movant’s sentence for his

cooperation, does not appear in the Amended Motion and is improperly raised for the first time in

Movant’s Reply (ECF No. 36). See, e.g., Herring v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 397 F.3d 1338, 1342

(11th Cir. 2005). However, the Court nonetheless briefly discusses why this claim fails on the

merits.

his negotiated plea agreement. /d. at 12-13. Third, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that Movant

stipulated that he identified himself as the master of the vessel when law enforcement boarded the

vessel, and Movant cannot demonstrate Strickland deficiency or prejudice for counsel’s failure to

challenge Movant’s representations while aboard the vessel prior to his change of plea. /d. at 13.

Further, “Movant waived pursuit of any defenses when he entered into a knowing and voluntary

plea.” Jd. Fourth, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that Movant and his co-conspirators stipulated that

they were each accountable for the entire load seized aboard the vessel, and thus were properly

held accountable under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3. /d. at 14. Fifth, Magistrate Judge Reid finds that nothing

in the record suggests that the Government made any representation that it would file or consider

filing a Rule 35(b) motion on Movant’s behalf, nor is there any allegation that the Government

refused to do so with an unconstitutional motive. /d. at 15-17. Finally, Magistrate Judge Reid

finds that Movant is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing in this matter and recommends that no

certificate of appealability issue, because Movant cannot meet his burden to show that reasonable

jurists could find the denial of his § 2255 motion debatable. /d. at 17-18. The Court agrees.

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Amended Motion, the R&R, the pertinent portions of

the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Reid’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37) is

ADOPTED and Movant’s Amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or

Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (ECF No. 30) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court

is instructed to CLOSE this case. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 28th day of May, 2021.

KO) aren

K. MICHAEL MOORE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

c: All counsel of record

Leimer Perez Castro

17348-104

Fort Dix

Federal Correctional Institution

Inmate Mail/Parcels

Post Office Box 2000

Joint Base MDL, NJ 08640

PRO SE

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.