The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 19-23182-CIV-MARTINEZ/AOR
ANDRES GOMEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
CANAIMA, LLC, d/b/a
EL PAUJI, LLC,
Defendant.
______________________________________________/
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Andres Gomez’s (“Plaintiff”) Verified
Motion for Attorney’s Fees (hereafter, “Motion for Fees and Costs”) [D.E. 15]. This matter was
referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 by the Honorable Jose E. Martinez, United
States District Judge [D.E. 16]. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned respectfully
recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and Costs be GRANTED.
On August 1, 2019, Plaintiff, who is blind, commenced this action seeking injunctive relief
pursuant to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
[D.E. 1]. On September 6, 2019, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint naming Defendant
Canaima, LLC (“Defendant”) as a party to this action [D.E. 6]. On October 3, 2019, a Clerk’s
Default was entered against Defendant [D.E. 12]. On June 4, 2020, the Court entered a Default
Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant, and instructed Plaintiff to file his
Motion for Fees and Costs on or before June 25, 2020. See Default Final Judgment [D.E. 14 at 3–
4]. On June 25, 2020, Plaintiff filed his Motion for Fees and Costs seeking $5,535 in attorney’s
fees and $620 in costs as the prevailing party in this action. See Motion for Fees and Costs [D.E.
15 at 7].
Title 42, United States Code, Section 12205 of the ADA (hereafter, “Section 12205”)
provides, “In any action or administrative proceeding commenced pursuant to this chapter, the
court or agency, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party . . . a reasonable attorney’s fee,
including litigation expenses, and costs . . . .” Id. Because Plaintiff obtained a Default Judgment
against Defendant, he is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to
Section 12205.
“A reasonable award of attorney’s fees is calculated using the lodestar method, which
requires the court to multiply the reasonable hours expended by a reasonable hourly rate.” Gary
Brown & Assocs., Inc. v. Ashdon, Inc., No. 05-CV-80359, 2006 WL 8435138, at *1 (S.D. Fla.
2006) (citing Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983)). “[T]he Court is an expert on the
issues of the prevailing market’s reasonable hourly rates for similar work and hours expended.”
Learning Connections, Inc. v. Kaufman, Englett & Lynd, PLLC, No. 11-CV-368, 2012 WL
13102412, at *4 (M.D. Fla. 2012) (citing Norman v. Hous. Auth. of City of Montgomery, 836 F.2d
1292, 1303 (11th Cir. 1988)).
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs, and the documents filed
in support thereof, the undersigned finds that the hourly rates and hours expended are reasonable
and recommends that $5,535 in attorney’s fees be awarded. See Motion for Fees and Costs [D.E.
15]; Affidavit of Jessica L. Kerr, Esq. [D.E. 13-2]. Additionally, the undersigned finds that the
costs requested are reasonable and recommends that the requested $620 for same be awarded. Id.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the foregoing, the undersigned RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDS that
Plaintiff's Motion for Fees and Costs [D.E. 16] be GRANTED and that Plaintiff be awarded
$5,535.00 in attorney’s fees and $620.00 in costs for a total award of $6,155.00.
Pursuant to Local Magistrate Judge Rule 4(b), the parties have fourteen days from the date
of this Report and Recommendation to file written objections, if any, with the Honorable Jose E.
Martinez, United States District Judge. Failure to file timely objections may bar the parties from
attacking the factual findings contained herein on appeal. See Resolution Tr. Corp. v. Hallmark
Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Further, “failure to object in accordance
with the provisions of [28 U.S.C.] § 636(b)(1) waives the right to challenge on appeal the district
court’s order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions.” See 11th Cir. R. 3-1 (1.0.P.
- 3).
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, on this 17th day of
September, 2020.
Lacie Bo Key
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
cc: United States District Judge Jose E. Martinez
Counsel of Record