The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Miami Division
Case Number: 18-25398-CIV-MORENO
KRISHNAN RAMANATHAN, ez. al.,
Plaintiffs,
VS.
FINANCIAL ALLIANCE LTD, ez. al.,
Defendants.
eee
FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment
against Defendants German Lillevali, Oleg Lillevali, Irina Korytina, Financial Alliance Ltd, and
Stream Network Advisory Ltd. (D.E. 42).
The Motion and supporting Exhibits show that Plaintiffs collectively suffered $10,751,790
in actual damages:
Plaintiff Actual Damages
$ 300,000
$ 657,109
$ 760,166
$ 8,108,315
$ 423,796
Shcherbakova $ 502,404
Total Actual § 10,751,790
Damages
Under the plain language of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the
final judgment must reflect an amount that is three times the amount of actual damages. See 18
U.S.C. § 1964(c) (“Any person injured . .. by reason of a violation of section 1962 of [the RICO
Act] may sue therefor... and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the
suit....”). The amount to be trebled consists solely of Plaintiffs’ actual damages. See Allstate
Ins. Co. v. Palterovich, 653 F. Supp. 2d 1306, 1333 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Here, three times the amount
of Plaintiffs’ actual damages ($10,751,790) is $32,255,370.
As for interest, post-judgment interest “shall be calculated from the date of the entry of the
judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as
published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the calendar week
preceding the date of the judgment.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). And where, as here, the controlling
federal statute is silent as to the manner of computing pre-judgment interest, the choice of a rate
of pre-judgment interest is within the discretion of a federal court. Allstate Ins. Co., 653 F. Supp.
2d at 1328-29 (citing Indus. Risk Insurers v. M.A.N. Gutehoffnungshutte Gmbi7, 141 F.3d 1434,
1446-47 (11th Cir. 1998)). This decision is usually guided by principles of reasonableness and
fairness, by relevant state law, and by the relevant post-judgment interest rate. /d. at 1329 (citing
In re Int’l Admin. Servs., Inc., 408 F.3d 689, 710 (11th Cir. 2005)). Here, the Court finds that the
post-judgment interest rate is a reasonable and a fair rate for pre-judgment interest as well.
Therefore, having considered the Motion, the attached Exhibits, the pertinent portions of
the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is
ADJUDGED that:
(1) The Motion for Default Judgment (D.E. 42) is GRANTED;
(2) A Final Default Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against
Defendants German Lillevali, Oleg Lillevali, Irina Korytina, Financial Alliance
Ltd, and Stream Network Advisory Ltd., jointly and severally, for the sum of
$32,255,370, sustained collectively by all Plaintiffs;
(3) Plaintiffs shall also be awarded post-judgment interest, at the statutory rate
under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date that the judgment is entered;
(4) Plaintiffs shall also be awarded pre-judgment interest, also at the statutory rate
under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from April 1, 2018 through the date of this Order;
(5) Plaintiffs are also entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs; and the Court
will retain jurisdiction to determine the reasonable amount of attorneys’ fees
and costs based upon a motion that shall be filed by Plaintiffs, along with the
necessary supporting documentation in accordance with the Federal and Local
Rules, within ninety days of the entry of judgment.
oh
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this J of June 2020,
FEDERICO he
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of Record