The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
CHYNNA RATNER,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No.: 8:18-cv-3037-T-24AAS
UNATION, INC., and GEORGE
BEARDSLEY,
Defendants.
______________________________________/
ORDER1
The court granted Chynna Ratner’s request for an award of attorney’s fees
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5).2 (Doc. 16). Ms. Ratner now seeks an award of $2,175
in attorney’s fees for 7.25 hours of attorney time at an hourly rate of $300. (Doc. 18).
UNATION, Inc. and George Beardsley (collectively, the defendants) oppose the
motion. (Doc. 20).
Upon review of the billing records, the court finds a reduction is necessary
because the time entries contain block billing. (Doc. 18, Ex. A). In using block billing,
1 Because attorney’s fees were awarded on a discovery related matter, a report and
recommendation is not necessary.
2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) states that if discovery is provided after a
motion to compel is filed, the court must award the prevailing party reasonable
expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred as a result of submitting the motion.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5). Here, the defendants provided their verified interrogatory
responses after Ms. Ratner moved to compel those responses, which were a month
overdue when Ms. Ratner’s counsel filed the motion to compel. (See Docs. 13, 14).
1
counsel listed several tasks in a single entry without specifying the time spent on
each task. Within those tasks, there is clerical work, such as filing motions and
preparing time records, which is not compensable at attorney rates. In addition,
certain time entries contain general research that may be excessive depending on the
time expended. The Eleventh Circuit has approved the use of an across-the-board
reduction for block billed entries. See Ceres Environmental Servs., Inc. v. Colonel
McCrary Trucking, LLC, 476 F. App’x 198, 203 (11th Cir. 2012); see also McBride v.
Legacy Components, LLC, No. 8:15-cv-1983-17TGW, 2018 WL 4381181, at *3 (M.D.
Fla. Aug. 30, 2018) (reducing billable hours by 35% based on block billed time entries);
Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures L.C., No. 04-22780-CIV, 2010 WL 1302914, at
*13 (S.D. Fla. March 30, 2010) (applying a 25% across-the-board reduction to block
billed hours). Counsel’s hours are reduced by 30%, to 5.1 hours, to account for the
block billed entries and the non-compensable work.
Attorney Nicholas J. Castellano, II, requests an hourly rate of $300. (Doc. 16,
Ex. B). “A reasonable hourly rate is the prevailing market rate in the relevant legal
community for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable skills,
experience, and reputation.” Norman v. Housing Auth. of Montgomery, 836 F.2d
1292, 1299 (11th Cir. 1988). In addition, the court may consult its own experience.
Id. at 1303. The party seeking attorney’s fees bears the burden of establishing that
the rate requested is reasonable. Loranger v. Stierheim, 10 F.3d 776, 781 (11th Cir.
1994) (per curiam).
2
Considering the skill required for the motion to compel and its related filings,
as well as counsel’s four years of experience, Mr. Castellano’s billing rate is reduced
to a $250 per hour. See, e.g., Payne v. River Rocks LLC, No. 6:15-cv-1727-ORL-40DCI,
2017 WL 976634, at *5 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 22, 2017) (finding $250 was a reasonable
hourly rate in an FLSA case for an attorney who practiced labor and employment law
for five years); Cano v. Crab Addison, Inc., 6:16-cv-1023-Orl-40KRS, 2016 WL
6782778, at *2-3 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 28, 2016) (finding $250 was a reasonable hourly rate
for attorney in FLSA case, who practiced law for four years).
Ms. Ratner’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 16) is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part. Ms. Ratner is awarded reasonable attorney’s fees in the amount
of $1,275, to be paid within thirty days from the date of this order.
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on September 27, 2019.
Aranda Ayre □□ Sarma.
AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE
United States Magistrate Judge