The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC, )
Plaintiff,
V. Civ. No. 17-1751-CFC/CJB
GOOGLE LLC, )
Defendant.
ORDER
Pending before me are Personal Audio’s objections (D.I. 740) to the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation issued on January 24, 2022 (D.1L.
721). The Magistrate Judge recommended in his Report and Recommendation
that I deny Personal Audio’s motion for summary judgment on Defendant’s
invalidity defense under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (D.I. 548). I have reviewed the Report
and Recommendation, the objections, Google’s response to the objections, and the
briefing the parties submitted to the Magistrate Judge in connection with the
motion.
The Magistrate Judge had the authority to make his findings and
recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). I review his findings and
recommendations de novo. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Brown
v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 Gd Cir. 2011).
I agree with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions and will
therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation and overrule Personal Audio’s
objections.
NOW THEREFORE, on this 28th day of February in 2022, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (D.I. 740) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (D.I. 721) is ADOPTED;
3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant’s Invalidity
Defense under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is DENIED.