Opinion

United States v. Brown

  • 51 F. App'x 417
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Nov 26, 2002
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Motz, Traxler, Gregory
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7011

JAMES ALBERT BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-

95-443-3)

Submitted: October 18, 2002 Decided: November 26, 2002

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Albert Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Chastain Wicker,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his

petition for a writ of quo warranto. We conclude Brown was required

to challenge his conviction and sentence via a 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion, or, if that remedy proved inadequate or ineffective,

by filing a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). Thus,

Brown was not entitled to a writ of quo warranto. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s judgment denying Brown’s petition. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.