The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6823
JACK MCRAE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD; DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; UNITED
STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES PAROLE
COMMISSION,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-283-3)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Carol Paskin Epstein,
Michael Alan Stern, ASSISTANT CORPORATION COUNSEL, D.C.,
Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jack McRae seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the
reasoning of the district court that McRae has not made a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See
McRae v. D.C. Parole Bd., No. CA-01-283-3 (E.D. Va. May 13, 2002).
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2