Opinion

Brown v. Director Dept Corr

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 5, 2002
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6091

RONALD JEFFREY BROWN, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-01-405-3)

Submitted: July 15, 2002 Decided: August 5, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Adam Adamski, ADAMSKI & CONTI, Chicago, Illinois, for

Appellant. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Jeffrey Brown, III, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

Brown v. Director Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-405-3 (E.D. Va.

Dec. 13, 2001). We deny Brown’s motion for oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.