Opinion

United States v. Brown

  • 36 F. App'x 159
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 10, 2002
Status
Unpublished
On the bench
Widener, Gregory, Hamilton
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6520

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LAMONT BROWN,

Defendant- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CR-94-100, CA-02-63-2)

Submitted: May 9, 2002 Decided: June 10, 2002

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamont Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Lamont Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, Nos.

CR-94-100; CA-02-63-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.