The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7303
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLES ANTHONY BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge.
(CR-94-297, CA-98-2620-12-4)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 25, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Anthony Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles Anthony Brown appeals the district court’s orders and
judgment denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Brown’s motion to supple-
ment his informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability, and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Brown, Nos. CR-94-297; CA-98-2620-12-4 (D.S.C. filed Aug.
14, 2000, entered Aug. 15, 2000; filed Aug. 24, 2000, entered
Aug. 25, 2000 & Mar. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2