The opinion
1 TMaOnOyRa EE L. AMWo oFrIeR,M S,B PN.C 2. 06683
2 300 South First Street, Suite 342
3 San Jose, California 95113
Telephone (408) 298-2000
4 Facsimile (408) 298-6046
E-mail: service@moorelawfirm.com
5
6 Attorney for Plaintiff,
Jose Trujillo
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
)
11 JOSE TRUJILLO, ) Case No. 1:22-cv-00983-BAM
)
12 Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF
13 vs. ) LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
) COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
14 BALDOMERO V. CISNEROS dba QUE )
PASA MEXICAN CAFE, et al., )
15
)
16 Defendants. )
)
17 )
18
19 WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”), seeks to amend his complaint to
20 allege additional access barriers which relate to his disability which were identified during the
21 pendency of this action;
22 WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit both urges and requires Plaintiff to identify in his
23 complaint all barriers identified which relate to his disability. Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.)
24 Inc., 631 F.3d 939, 944 (9th Cir. 2011); Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 909 (9th
25 Cir. 2011);
26 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not unduly delayed the amendment, does not bring it in bad
27 faith, the amendment is not futile, and such amendment does not prejudice the defendants, nor
28 does the amendment in any way change the nature of the action; and
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;
1 WHEREAS, this amendment would not alter any dates or deadlines set by the Court;
2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and
3 Defendants, Baldomero V. Cisneros dba Que Pasa Mexican Cafe and Heiskell Ranches, L.P.
4 (“Defendants”), the parties to this Action, through their respective attorneys of record, that
5 Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
6 “A” with redlines showing the changes from the original Complaint.
7 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint
8 within five (5) calendar days of the Court’s Order permitting such filing, and that Defendants’
9 responses thereto shall be due as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
10 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12 Dated: May 31, 2023 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
13
14 /s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
15 Attorney for Plaintiff,
Jose Trujillo
16
17
Dated: May 31, 2023 CLIFFORD & BROWN
18
/s/ William A. Bruce
19 William A. Bruce
Attorneys for Defendant,
20
Baldomero V. Cisneros dba Que Pasa
21 Mexican Cafe
22
Dated: May 31, 2023 McCORMICK, KABOT & LEW APC.
23
24 /s/ Chad M. Lew
Chad M. Lew
25 Attorneys for Defendant,
Heiskell Ranches, L.P.
26
27 ///
28 ///
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;
1 ATTESTATION
2 Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s)
3 whose electronic signature is attributed above.
4 /s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
5
Attorney for Plaintiff,
6 Jose Trujillo
7
ORDER
8
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff may file his First Amended Complaint, a
10
redlined copy of which was filed with the Parties’ stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of
11
the date this Order is filed.
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ responses thereto shall be filed within
13
the time required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
14
15 IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated: June 1, 2023 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _
17
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;