The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6688
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KERMIT C. BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CR-98-47)
Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 15, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kermit C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Kermit C. Brown appeals from the district court’s orders
denying Brown’s motion for transcripts and other documents from his
criminal trial and declining to reconsider that order. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Brown, No. CR-98-47 (E.D. Va.
Mar. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2