Opinion

(PC) Valencia v. San Juan

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jan 12, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.2%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 CHRISTOPHER G. VALENCIA, Case No. 1:22-cv-00360-JLT-EPG (PC)

10 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

11 v.

12 DEBORAH SAN JUAN,

13 Defendant(s).

14

15 Christopher Valencia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

16 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

17 On December 6, 2022, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling

18 and discovery statements. (ECF No. 27). The parties have now filed their statements. (ECF

19 Nos. 32 & 33).

20 The Court has reviewed this case and the parties’ statements. In an effort to secure the

21 just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,1 the Court will direct that certain

22 documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced.2

23

24 1 See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 508-09 (9th Cir. 2008) (“We begin with the

principle that the district court is charged with effectuating the speedy and orderly administration of justice. There

25 is universal acceptance in the federal courts that, in carrying out this mandate, a district court has the authority to

enter pretrial case management and discovery orders designed to ensure that the relevant issues to be tried are

26

identified, that the parties have an opportunity to engage in appropriate discovery and that the parties are

adequately and timely prepared so that the trial can proceed efficiently and intelligibly.”).

27 2 Advisory Committee Notes to 1993 Amendment to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding Rule

26(a) (“The enumeration in Rule 26(a) of items to be disclosed does not prevent a court from requiring by order or

28

local rule that the parties disclose additional information without a discovery request.”).

1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

2 1. Each party has sixty days from the date of service of this order to serve opposing

3 parties, or their counsel, if represented, with copies of the following documents

4 and/or evidence that they have in their possession, custody, or control, to the

5 extent the parties have not already done so:3

6 a. Documents regarding exhaustion of Plaintiff’s claims, including 602s,

7 Form 22s, and responses from the appeals office. This includes, but is

8 not limited to, the 602 with log number 156679.

9 b. The Board of Parole Hearings transcript from Plaintiff’s parole hearing

10 that was held on or around August 19, 2021.

11 2. If any party obtains documents and/or other evidence described above later in

12 the case from a third party, that party shall provide all other parties with copies

13 of the documents and/or evidence within thirty days.

14 3. Parties do not need to produce documents or evidence that they have already

15 produced.

16 4. Parties do not need to produce documents or evidence that were provided to

17 them by the opposing party.

18 5. Parties may object to producing any of the above-listed documents and/or

19 evidence. Objections shall be filed with the Court and served on all other parties

20 within sixty days from the date of service of this order (or within thirty days of

21 receiving additional documents and/or evidence). The objection should include

22 the basis for not providing the documents and/or evidence. If Defendant(s)

23 object based on the official information privilege, Defendant(s) shall follow the

24 procedures described in the Court’s scheduling order.

25 \\\

26 \\\

27

3 Defense counsel is requested to obtain these documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of confinement. If

28

defense counsel is unable to do so, defense counsel should inform Plaintiff that a third party subpoena is required.

1 If a party files an objection, all other parties have fourteen days from the date the

2 objection is filed to file a response. If any party files a response to an objection,

3 the Court will issue a ruling on the objection.

4

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 || Dated: _ January 12, 2023 [see hey

7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.