Opinion

Hernandez v. County of Fresno

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Dec 21, 2022
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,

Wayte & Carruth LLP

2 Mart B. Oller IV, #149186

7647 North Fresno Street

3 Fresno, California 93720

Telephone: (559) 433-1300

4 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300

5 Attorneys for COUNTY OF FRESNO

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

8

9 VERONICA HERNANDEZ; R.H., a minor, Case No. 1:22-cv-01145-ADA-EPG

by and through her Guardian ad Litem,

10 VERONICA HERNANDEZ; and M.H. a STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem,

11 VERONICA HERNANDEZ,

12 Plaintiffs,

13 v.

14 COUNTY OF FRESNO, a public entity;

PROTEUS, INC., a corporation; DOE

15 FRESNO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

SOCIAL SERVICES SOCIAL WORKER, an

16 individual; DOE FRESNO COUNTY (ECF No. 16)

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

17 SUPERVISOR, an individual; and DOES 1-

40, inclusive,

18

Defendants.

19

20 Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Veronica

21 Hernandez, in her individual capacity and as Guardian ad Litem for M.H and R.H. (“collectively

22 Plaintiffs”) and Defendants County of Fresno and Proteus, Inc.(“Collectively Defendants”), through

23 counsel undersigned, jointly submit this Stipulated Protective Order to govern the handling of

24 information and materials produced in the course of discovery or filed with the Court in advance of

25 trial in this action.

26 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO L.R. 141.1(c)

27 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of

1 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties

2 hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The

3 parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or

4 responses to discovery, and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only

5 to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under applicable legal

6 principles.

7 The circumstances supporting the confidentiality of the juvenile files and records at issue in

8 this case are set forth in the Stipulation and Order of November 30, 2022, Doc. 15, at 1-5 and 7.

9 This Court’s Order of that date has determined that there is good cause to allow the parties access

10 to these juvenile records “and that adequate and effective safeguards, in the form of a Protective

11 Order, may be put in place to limit disclosure and use of the information from those files outside

12 this litigation. Further, this Court finds that appropriate sealing orders may be entered to limit public

13 access to specific documents and information, upon application of any party to this action or any

14 third party with standing to make such a request for sealing. See Local Rules 141, 141.1.” Doc. 15,

15 at 7:7-13.

16 Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(1):

17 Examples of confidential information that the parties may seek to protect from unrestricted

18 or unprotected disclosure include:

19 a) Information that is the subject of, or related to, juvenile proceedings and

20 investigations that are protected from public disclosure under California law (see Cal. Welf.

21 & Inst. Code § 827 et seq.);

22 b) The names and identities of the minor parties;

23 c) Facts and circumstances described in the juvenile proceedings, and in investigations

24 leading to the juvenile proceedings, or related in any way to them;

25 d) Names and identifying information relating to third parties mentioned or involved in

26 the juvenile proceedings and investigations;

27 e) Confidential medical and/or mental health records of Plaintiffs, and

1 f) Any other information properly deemed confidential under California law protecting

2 juveniles.

3 Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(2):

4 Generally speaking, information and documents shall only be designated under this

5 Protective Order because the Designating Party believes the information or documents are

6 confidential information that the Designating Party cannot, or would not, release publicly.

7 Confidential or personal information about juveniles is protected from disclosure under California

8 law. See Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 827 et seq. While this statute is not binding on federal courts,

9 federal courts respect its purposes and strive to maintain confidentiality of such records as much as

10 possible, consistent with federal rules. Unrestricted disclosure of such information could harm the

11 subject juveniles, impair the workings of the juvenile systems in place, and violate legitimate public

12 policy. Additionally, broader privacy interests must be safeguarded. Furthermore, Plaintiffs have

13 a constitutionally protected privacy interest in avoiding disclosure of their medical information,

14 especially in the context of allegations of sexual assault that occurred while they were minors.

15 Norman-Bloodsaw v. Lawrence Berkely Laboratory, 135 F. 3d 1260, 1269 (9th Cir. 1998); Doe by

16 and through Tanis v. County of San Diego, 576 F. Supp. 3d 721, 733-34 (S.D. Cal. 2021).

17 Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit that there is good cause for the entry of this Protective

18 Order. Again, this Court has found that a Protective Order is called for to protect this information.

19 Doc. 15, at 7:7-13.

20 Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(3):

21 The parties submit that protecting the confidential nature of information in this way will be

22 most efficient for the parties and the Court. The contended liability issues in the instant case will

23 involve the mutual exchange of documents and other information that each party may consider to

24 be confidential, and may include information a party is mandated to keep confidential by state law.

25 Both Plaintiffs and Defendants will be impaired in their ability to prosecute and defend the claims

26 if they have no access to the subject juvenile files and records. The parties have met and conferred

27 on this issue and agree that the instant stipulation and proposed Order are a fair and workable way

1 PROTECTIVE ORDER

2 1. DEFINITIONS.

3 (a) The term “Challenging Party” shall mean a Party or Non-Party that challenges the

4 designation of information or items as Confidential or Protected Material under this Order.

5 (b) The term “Confidential” shall mean information (regardless of how it is generated,

6 stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil

7 Procedure 26(c). The term includes any matter deemed confidential and protected from public

8 disclosure under California law relating to juveniles.

9 (c) The term “Counsel” shall mean the attorneys of record for any party in this action,

10 their associates and their staff. If any party seeks to add counsel of record or substitute counsel of

11 record, then no “Confidential” Documents and information shall be discussed to such additional or

12 substitute counsel of record until they have agreed to this stipulation by executing the attached

13 Exhibit A.

14 (d) The term “Designating Party” shall mean a Party or Non-Party that designates

15 information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “Confidential.”

16 (e) The term “Documents” shall have the same meaning as the terms “documents and

17 electronically stored information” as used in Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

18 (f) The term “Expert” shall mean a person with specialized knowledge or experience in

19 a matter pertinent to this litigation who has been retained by a Party to serve as an expert witness or

20 as a consultant in this litigation and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an

21 officer, director, or employee of a Party. Nothing in this Protective Order purports to alter in any

22 way the requirements for offering testimony under Fed. R. Evid. 703, or the expert disclosure

23 requirements under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, or to define the term “expert” for purposes other than those

24 addressed in this Protective Order.

25 (g) The term “House Counsel” shall mean attorneys who are employees of a party to this

26 action, and shall include, for the County and its departments, officers, and employees, County

27 Counsel. House Counsel does not include outside counsel of record, or any other outside counsel.

1 (h) The term “Non-Party” shall mean any natural person, partnership, corporation,

2 association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.

3 (i) The term “Party” shall mean any party named in this action, including all of its

4 officers, directors, employees, and consultants retained in the ordinary course of operation or

5 business.

6 (j) The term “Producing Party” shall mean a Party or Non-Party that produces

7 information or other discovery material in this action.

8 (k) The term “Professional Vendors” shall mean persons or entities that provide

9 litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or

10 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their

11 employees and subcontractors.

12 (l) The term “Protected Material” shall mean any information or other discovery

13 material that is designated as “Confidential.”

14 (m) The term “Receiving Party” shall mean a Party that receives information or other

15 discovery material from a Producing Party.

16 2. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL.

17 (a) Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or

18 Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to

19 limit any such designations as follows. The Designating Party must designate for protection only

20 those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify under the

21 appropriate standards so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications

22 for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

23 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited, unless confidentiality of the

24 designated materials is mandated by law, in a party’s good faith interpretation of law. Designations

25 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to

26 unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses

27 and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to a Designating

1 protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the

2 mistaken designation.

3 (b) Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order or

4 as otherwise stipulated or ordered, discovery material and information that qualify for protection

5 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. The

6 Designating Party must use reasonable efforts to ensure that the applicable legend appears on each

7 page of each file produced, as permitted by the particular format of a given Document.

8 (c) Materials Subject to Designation. Each party to this litigation may designate any

9 Document, thing, interrogatory answer, admission, deposition testimony, and portions of such

10 materials, or other information which it has provided or which a third-party has provided as

11 “Confidential” in accordance with this Protective Order. The party designating such information as

12 “Confidential” shall be known as the “Designating Party” and the designation shall be set out

13 thereon. In designating Documents or information as “Confidential,” the Designating Party’s

14 counsel shall make a good faith determination, before applying the designation, that the information

15 warrants protection under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

16 (d) Designating Originals or Tangible Items. In the event the Producing Party elects to

17 produce original Documents and things for inspection rather than produce copies of Documents, no

18 marking need be made by the Producing Party in advance of the initial inspection. Thereafter, upon

19 selection of specified Documents for copying by the inspecting party, the Producing Party shall

20 mark the copies of such Documents as may contain protected subject matter with the appropriate

21 confidentiality marking at the time the copies are produced to the inspecting party. Said marking

22 shall not delay the production of the copies. Information obtained by counsel from initial review of

23 Documents, whether in written form or not, shall be maintained as “Confidential” unless such

24 information is produced without a designation of confidentiality, or as otherwise designated by the

25 Producing Party.

26 (e) Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to

27 designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s

1 designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated

2 in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

3 3. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS.

4 (a) Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

5 confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality

6 designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable and substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic

7 burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to

8 challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the

9 original designation is disclosed.

10 (b) Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process

11 by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each

12 challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must

13 recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph

14 of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must

15 begin the process by conferring directly (in voice-to-voice dialogue; other forms of communication

16 are not sufficient) within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the

17 Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not

18 proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to

19 reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the

20 chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process

21 only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party

22 is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner.

23 (c) Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court

24 intervention, the Designating Party shall file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality within

25 twenty-one (21) days of the initial notice of challenge or within fourteen (14) days of the parties

26 agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Any

27 motion seeking relief from the Court must comply with Local Rule 251, including the Joint

1 Standing Order ¶ 2, including without limitation the requirement of an informal discovery

2 conference with Judge Grosjean and the Court’s authorization before any formal discovery motion

3 is filed. Failure by the Designating Party to make such a motion, including the required declaration

4 within fourteen (14) days (or seven (7) days, if applicable), shall automatically waive the

5 confidentiality designation for each challenged designation. In addition, the Challenging Party may

6 file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing

7 so, including a challenge to the designation of a deposition transcript or any portions thereof. Any

8 motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration

9 affirming that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by the

10 preceding paragraph.

11 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating

12 Party. All parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it

13 is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the challenge.

14 Nothing in this Paragraph 3(c) shall prevent the parties from jointly stipulating to the

15 Informal Telephonic Conference procedure set forth in Judge Grosjean’s Standard Procedures, ¶ 2.

16 4. ACCESS TO “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIALS.

17 (a) A Receiving Party may only use “Confidential” Materials that are disclosed or

18 produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with prosecuting, defending, or

19 attempting to settle this litigation. Such “Confidential” Material may be disclosed only to the

20 categories of person and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been

21 terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions for Final Disposition of Protected

22 Material set forth below.

23 (b) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating

24 Party, a Receiving Party may only disclose any information or item designated as “Confidential” to:

25 (i) The Receiving Party’s outside counsel of record, as well as employees of said

26 outside counsel of record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose this information;

27 (ii) The officers, directors, and employees (including where applicable County

1 reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgement and Agreement

2 to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

3 (iii) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party and employees of

4 said Experts to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose this information, and who have signed

5 the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

6 (iv) The Court and its personnel;

7 (v) Court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock

8 jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and

9 who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

10 (vi) During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is

11 reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”

12 (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of

13 transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be

14 so marked by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this

15 Stipulated Protective Order.

16 (vii) The author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

17 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

18 5. STORAGE OF PROTECTED INFORMATION BY RECEIVING PARTY.

19 The recipient of any Confidential materials provided under this Protective Order (including

20 copies or excerpts made thereof) shall maintain such information in a secure and safe area, and shall

21 exercise reasonable and proper care with respect to the storage, custody, use, and/or dissemination

22 of such information.

23 6. TREATMENT OF PROTECTED MATERIAL AT DEPOSITIONS IN THIS

24 LITIGATION.

25 (a) Deposition of the Authors and Recipients of Protected Material. With respect to

26 Documents designated as “Confidential,” or as including “Confidential” material, any person

27 indicated on the face of the Document to be its originator, author, or recipient may be shown the

1 “Confidential” material may be shown to any employee of the Designating Party and/or the party

2 that produced the Document so designated in this litigation during the deposition of that employee

3 if the employee would otherwise have lawful access to or knowledge of the “Confidential” material

4 contained in that Document.

5 (b) Exclusion of Certain Persons From Protected Deposition Testimony. Any Party shall

6 have the right to exclude from attendance at a deposition, during such time as the “Confidential”

7 Documents or information is to be disclosed, every individual not entitled under the Protective Order

8 to receipt of the information, excluding the parties’ and deponent’s counsel of record, deponent and

9 the court reporter and/or videographer. The Parties shall exercise restraint if and when excluding

10 persons from a deposition pursuant to this paragraph.

11 (c) Procedure for Designating Transcript Sections as Protected Material. Whenever a

12 deposition taken on behalf of any party involves a disclosure of “Confidential” Documents or

13 information of any party, said deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as containing

14 “Confidential” subject to the provisions of this Protective Order at the time the deposition is taken

15 whenever possible; however, any Party shall have until ten (10) days after receipt of the deposition

16 transcript within which to designate, in writing, those portions of the transcript it wishes to remain

17 designated as “Confidential,” and the right to make such designation shall be waived unless made

18 within the ten (10) day period. During such ten (10) period, the entirety of the transcript shall be

19 deemed designated ”Confidential” to preserve the right of any Party to make a final designation of

20 “Confidential” during that ten (10) day period.

21 7. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER

22 LITIGATION.

23 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in another litigation that compels

24 disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “Confidential,” that Party must:

25 (a) Promptly notify the Designating Party in writing. Such notification shall include a

26 copy of the subpoena or court order;

27 / / /

1 (b) Promptly notify, in writing, the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in

2 the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to

3 this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

4 (c) Cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the

5 Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

6 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena

7 or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “Confidential” before

8 a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained

9 the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of

10 seeking protection in that court of its confidential material ― and nothing in these provisions should

11 be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful

12 directive from another court.

13 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL OF A NON-PARTY SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS

14 LITIGATION.

15 (a) Applicability. The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a

16 Non-Party in this action and designated as “Confidential.” Such information produced by Non-

17 Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this

18 Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking

19 additional protections.

20 (b) Notice Procedure. In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request,

21 to produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an

22 agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the

23 Party shall:

24 (i) Promptly notify, in writing, the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that

25 some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party;

26 (ii) Promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective

27 Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of

1 (iii) Make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.

2 (c) Disclosure and Remedy. If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order

3 from this Court within fourteen (14) days of receiving the above notice and accompanying

4 information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive

5 to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall

6 not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality

7 agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the Court. Absent a court order to the

8 contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this Court of its

9 Protected Material.

10 9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL.

11 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected

12 Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order,

13 the Receiving Party must immediately (1) notify in writing the Designating Party of the

14 unauthorized disclosures, (2) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected

15 Material, (3) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the

16 terms of this Order, and (4) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and

17 Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

18 10. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED

19 MATERIAL.

20 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently

21 produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the

22 Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision

23 is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that

24 provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d)

25 and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or

26 information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the parties may

27 incorporate their agreement into the stipulated protective order submitted to the court.

1 11. FINAL DISPOSITION.

2 (a) Upon Termination of this Action. Within sixty (60) days after a final disposition of

3 the action, which shall include entry of final judgment and the exhaustion of all rights of appeal, or

4 a dismissal of the action, a Receiving Party shall either return to the Producing Party or destroy all

5 Documents and things or transcripts of depositions, together with all copies thereof, which have

6 been designated “Confidential.” Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an

7 archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal

8 memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product,

9 and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any

10 such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective

11 Order.

12 12. MISCELLANEOUS.

13 (a) Right to Seek Modification. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person

14 to seek its modification by the court in the future.

15 (b) Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to entry of this Protective Order, no

16 Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information

17 on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any

18 right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective

19 Order.

20 (c) Filings of Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected

21 Material must fully comply with Local Rule 141.

22

23

24 Dated: December 19, 2022 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,

WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP

25

26 By: /s/ Mart B. Oller, IV

Mart B. Oller, IV

27

Attorney for Defendant COUNTY OF FRESNO

1 Dated: December 19, 2022 GREENBERG GROSS, LLP

2

3

By: /s/ Daniel S. Cha

4 Daniel S. Cha

Attorney for Plaintiffs VERONICA HERNANDEZ;

5 R.H., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad

Litem, VERONICA HERNANDEZ; and M.H. a

6

minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem,

7 VERONICA HERNANDEZ

8

9 Dated: December 19, 2022 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON, LLP

10

11

By: /s/ Carla Meninsky

12 Bradley Zamczyk

Carla Meninsky

13 Attorneys for Defendant PROTEUS, INC.|

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

1 ORDER

2 Upon review of the parties’ stipulated protective order (ECF No. 16), the Court finds it

3 || acceptable in most respects. However, the Court notes that the parties define the term

4 || “Confidential” to “mean information (regardless of how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or

5 || tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).” Such a

6 definition improperly allows the parties to deem information confidential so long as they

7 subjectively believe that it qualifies for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and

8 without ever disclosing the types of information at issue as required by Local Rule 141(c)(1).

9 Accordingly, the Court limits the definition of confidential information to those categories that the

parties sufficiently identify as warranting protection in the section of the protective order titled

10

“Statement Under L.R. 141.1(c)(1),” which includes, among other things, the names and identities

11

of the minor parties.

12

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties stipulated protective order (ECF No. 16) is

13

approved as revised above.

14

!5 || rr IS SO ORDERED.

16

Dated: _December 21, 2022 [spe ey □□

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

18

19

20 $$

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BARSTOW,

WAYTE &

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.