Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Nov 15, 2000
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DOVON BROWN, a/k/a Capone,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CR-95-144-H, CA-99-672-H)

Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dovon Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dovon Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability, deny Brown’s motion for judicial notice, and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Brown, Nos. CR-95-144-H; CA-99-672-H (E.D.N.C. filed July 10;

entered July 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.