Opinion

(PC) Salazar v. Grant

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Dec 11, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.5%

The opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JOSHUA SALAZAR, Case No. 2:19-cv-01336-TLN-JDP (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

14 BROWN, et al.

ECF No. 24

15 Defendants.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

16 DAYS

17

18 On October 26, 2020, defendants filed a motion to compel plaintiff to provide responses

19 to interrogatories and requests for production of documents. ECF No. 24. To date, plaintiff has

20 not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion.

21 In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party

22 is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the

23 date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a

24 statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the

25 motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id.

26 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires

27 litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute

28 or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres.

1 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,

2 | 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to

3 | administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan □□□

4 | Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.

5 Plaintiff will be given a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for

6 | his failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court’s local rules. Accordingly, plaintiff is

7 | ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this case should not be dismissed for failure

8 | to prosecute and failure to comply with the local rules. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this

9 | lawsuit, plaintiff shall, within twenty-one days, file an opposition or statement of opposition to

10 || defendant’s motion. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this

11 | action be dismissed.

12

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 ( 4 ie —

Dated: _ December 11, 2020 Q_—_—.

15 JEREMY D. PETERSON

16 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.