The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1131
BRADLY G. DALTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SCHOOL BOARD OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ROY NICHOLS, Former Superintendent; JOHN
SMITH, School Administrator; PAMELA RIDDICK,
School Administrator; CATHY LASSITER, School
Administrator; ANN HALL, School Administrator,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CA-98-975-2)
Submitted: July 14, 2000 Decided: August 1, 2000
Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradly G. Dalton, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel R. Hagemeister, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Bradly G. Dalton appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to the School Board of the City of Norfolk in this
action alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Dalton v. School Bd. of Norfolk,
No. CA-98-975-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2