Opinion

(SS) Grom v. Commissioner of Social Security

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Aug 24, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.5%

The opinion

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

1

United States Attorney

2 DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, CSBN 230138

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

3 Social Security Administration

ELLINOR R. CODER, CSBN 258258

4

Special Assistant United States Attorney

5 160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

6 Telephone: (415) 977-8955

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

7

E-Mail: Ellinor.Coder@ssa.gov

8 Attorneys for Defendant

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

11

12 ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01361-SKO

DAVID GROM, )

13 ) STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND

Plaintiff, ) PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND

14 ) EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL

vs. ) ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; ORDER

15 ANDREW SAUL, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

16 )

)

17 Defendant. )

)

18

19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned

20 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and

21 expenses in the amount of five-thousand, one hundred and forty-five dollars and sixty-nine

22 cents ($5,145.69) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This

23 amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by

24 counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d).

25 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider

26 the matter of [Plaintiff]’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s Counsel. Pursuant to Astrue

27 v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the

28 assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United

1 States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered,

2 the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

3 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury

4 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the

5 payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Counsel, pursuant to the assignment

6 executed by Plaintiff (Dkt. 25-3 at 3-5). Any payments made shall be delivered to Counsel.

7 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA

8 attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under

9 the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release

10 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel including Counsel’s firm may

11 have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

12 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel and/or Counsel’s firm to seek

13 Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause

14 provisions of the EAJA.

15

Respectfully submitted,

16

Dated: August 21, 2020

17 By: /s/ Kelsey Mackenzie Brown*

KELSEY MACKENZIE BROWN

18

* By email authorization on August 21, 2020

19 Attorneys for Plaintiff

20 Dated: August 21, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

21

DEBORAH LEE STACHEL

22 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

23

24 By: /s/ Ellinor R. Coder

ELLINOR R. CODER

25 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

26 Attorneys for Defendant

27

28

ORDER

1

2 Based upon the parties’ above stipulation, for good cause shown, attorney’s fees in the

3 amount of five thousand one hundred and forty-five dollars and sixty-nine cents ($5,145.69)

4

under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be awarded to Plaintiff

5

subject to the terms of the stipulation. In light of this stipulation, Plaintiff’s “Motion for

6

Attorneys Fees and Expenses Under the Equal Access to Justice Act,” (Doc. 25), is denied as

7

8 moot.

9

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

Sheila K. Oberto

12

Dated: August 24, 2020 /s/ .

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.