The opinion
2.4U UV VLVLOOWINEL LMYVUULLIOEE or VOrstiecy Payee +ViIs+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 BRIAN KEITH STAFFORD, Case No. 20-cv-4115-SVK
12 Petitioner,
ORDER OF TRANSFER
v.
G. MATTESON,
©
15 Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner at California State Prison — Solano, has filed a petition for a writ
17
of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a decision by the Board of Parole
Z 18
Hearings. Where a habeas petition challenges the manner in which a sentence is being executed,
19
e.g., if it involves parole claims, the district of confinement is the preferable forum. See Habeas
20
L.R. 2254-3(b)(2); see also Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989).
21
Because Solano County lies within the Eastern District of California, venue is proper in
22
that District. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(d). Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United
23
States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk
24
shall terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
57 || DATED: __August 11, 2020 —Seasoen Vaal
SUSAN VAN KEULEN
28 United States Magistrate Judge