Opinion

(PC) Wilkins v. Barber

Court
District Court, E.D. California
Filed
Jul 29, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.5%

The opinion

2.4L VV VILVIVIO VV INGVIN MVVULTIGCEI Lr Vilevicy Paye +vrst

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 KEENAN WILKINS, aka NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 KJN P

BROWN,

12

Plaintiff,

13 ORDER

Vv.

14

5 DR. CHRISTINE S. BARBER, et al.,

Defendants.

16

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On July 13, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion

18 || to seal medical records. (ECF No. 97.) Plaintiff argues that the medical records appended to the

19 | June 9, 2020 declaration are confidential and thus there is a compelling reason to seal them, citing

20 | Chester v. King, 2019 WL 5420213 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2019), and Kamakana v. City and County

21 | of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). CECF No. 97.)

22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the date of

23 | this order, counsel for defendant Mansour shall file a response to plaintiff's motion to seal (ECF

24 | No. 97).

25 Dated: July 29, 2020

26 Al Norra

27 KENDALL J. Wha

pwilk1338.mts UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.