Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 16, 2000
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7690

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TERENCE DAMISI BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CR-90-398-A, CA-98-1774-AM)

Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 16, 2000

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terence Damisi Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Brett Alan Sagel, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Terence Damisi Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-

soning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, Nos. CR-

90-398-A; CA-98-1774-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.