The opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2499
JAMES F. BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENTEC, INCORPORATED (CCW); LES PETERS, indi-
vidually; PAM DAUGHERTY, individually,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-98-166-4-H)
Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James F. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Herbert Seesholtz Falk, Jr.,
William Francis Patterson, Jr., TURNER, ENOCHS & LLOYD, P.A.,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James F. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Title VII of The Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Kentec, Incor-
porated, No. CA-98-166-4-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2