The opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9 Verna K Brown, No. CV-22-01848-PHX-DMF
10 Plaintiff, ORDER
11 v.
12 Precious Lavern Brown, et al.,
13 Defendants.
14
15 This matter was assigned to Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine. (Doc. 3). On March
16 20, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation with this Court.1 (Doc.
17 14). To date, no objections have been filed.
18 STANDARD OF REVIEW
19 The Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
20 1 This case is assigned to a Magistrate Judge. However, not all parties have consented
to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Thus, the matter is before this Court pursuant
21 to General Order 21-25, which states in relevant part:
22 When a United States Magistrate Judge to whom a civil action has been
assigned pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(a)(1) considers dismissal to be
23 appropriate but lacks the jurisdiction to do so under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1)
due to incomplete status of election by the parties to consent or not consent
24 to the full authority of the Magistrate Judge,
25 IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge will prepare a Report and
Recommendation for the Chief United States District Judge or designee.
26
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED designating the following District Court
27 Judges to review and, if deemed suitable, to sign the order of dismissal on
my behalf:
28
Phoenix/Prescott: Senior United States District Judge Stephen M. McNamee
1 || recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see □□□□□□ □□
2|| Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have fourteen days from the service
3|| of a copy of the Magistrate’s recommendation within which to file specific written
4|| objections to the Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a
5 || Magistrate Judge’s recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of
6|| the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on
7\| appeal. See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a
8 || Magistrate Judge’s conclusion “is a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of
9|| finding waiver of an issue on appeal.” Id.
10 DISCUSSION
11 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no
12 || Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and
13 || adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
14 CONCLUSION
15 Accordingly, for the reasons set forth,
16 IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
|| Judge. (Doc. 14).
18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing without prejudice the Complaint.
(Doc. 1).
20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate this
case.
22 Dated this 10th day of April, 2023.
23
24
25 — Lil nora
Hdhorable Stephen M. McNamee
26 Senior United States District Judge
27
28
_2-