Review of appeals — Qualifications of reviewers
OklahomaStatutes
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
OK Code › Title 36 › Section 36-6570.53
Text
A utilization review entity shall ensure that all appeals are
reviewed by a physician, pharmacist, or licensed mental health
professional. The physician, pharmacist, or licensed mental health
professional shall:
Oklahoma Statutes - Title 36. Insurance Page 1319
1. Possess a current and valid unrestricted license in any
United States jurisdiction;
2. Be of the same or similar specialty as a physician,
pharmacist, or licensed mental health professional who typically
manages the medical condition or disease, which means that the
physician either maintains board certification for the same or
similar specialty as the medical condition in question or whose
training and experience:
a. includes treating the condition,
b. includes treating complications that may result from
the service or procedure, and
c. is sufficient for the physician, pharmacist, or
licensed mental health professional to determine if
the service or procedure is medically necessary or
clinically appropriate,
except for appeals coming from a licensed mental health
professional, which may be conducted by another licensed mental
health professional as opposed to a physician, or for appeals coming
from a pharmacist, which may be conducted by another licensed
pharmacist as opposed to a physician;
3. Not have been directly involved in making the adverse
determination;
4. Not have any financial interest in the outcome of the
appeal; and
5. Consider all known clinical aspects of the health care
service under review, including, but not limited to, a review of
those medical records which are pertinent and relevant to the active
condition provided to the utilization review entity by the
enrollee's health care provider, or a health care facility, and any
pertinent medical literature provided to the utilization review
entity by the health care provider.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.