Section 336.120 The Administrative Law Judge
IllinoisRegulations
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Illinois Administrative Code › Title 89 SOCIAL SERVICES › CHAPTER III: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES › Part 336 APPEAL OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT INVESTIGATION FINDINGS › Section 336.120 The Administrative Law Judge
Text
Section 336
Section 336.120 The
Administrative Law Judge
a) Appointment of the ALJ
The Chief
Administrative Law Judge shall select a trained, impartial ALJ from the
available pool to conduct the appeal hearing. The ALJ shall:
1) be an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of
Illinois;
2) possess knowledge and information acquired through training
and/or experience relevant to the field of child and family welfare law,
including familiarity with Department rules, procedures and functions;
3) not have been involved in the decision to take the action
being appealed or have rendered legal advice to the decision-maker on the
issue; and
4) not have a personal or professional interest that interferes
with exercising objectivity or have any bias against the parties or issues
appealed. An adverse ruling, in and of itself, shall not constitute bias or
conflict of interest.
b) Functions of the ALJ
The
Administrative Law Judge shall have all authority allowed under the Illinois
Administrative Procedure Act [5 ILCS 100]. This authority shall include, but
is not limited to, the following:
1) conduct a fair, impartial and formal hearing in which the strict
rules of evidence do not apply;
2) provide for the recording of the hearing;
3) inform participants of their individual rights and their
responsibilities;
4) conduct pre-hearing telephone conferences between the parties
or their authorized representatives to provide information about the procedural
aspects of the hearing, narrow the issues and discuss possible stipulations and
contested points of law, in order to expedite the actual hearing;
5) have the authority to recommend changes in the child abuse and
neglect report in the State Central Register;
6) take necessary steps to develop a full and fair record that
contains all relevant facts;
7) administer an oath or an affirmation to all witnesses;
8) quash or modify subpoenas for goo
contested points of law, in order to expedite the actual hearing;
5) have the authority to recommend changes in the child abuse and
neglect report in the State Central Register;
6) take necessary steps to develop a full and fair record that
contains all relevant facts;
7) administer an oath or an affirmation to all witnesses;
8) quash or modify subpoenas for good cause, including but not
limited to relevance, scope, materiality and emotional harm or trauma to the
subpoenaed witness;
9) allow into evidence all inculpatory and exculpatory evidence
helpful in determining whether an indicated perpetrator abused or neglected a
child, including oral and written reports and the investigative file, that the ALJ
and the Director may rely upon to the extent of its probative value;
10) allow into evidence previous statements made by the child
relating to abuse or neglect as hearsay exceptions;
11) preserve all documents and evidence for the record;
12) rule upon evidentiary issues and contested issues of law at
the hearing or take matters under advisement pending issuance of the written
opinion and recommendation;
13) order the removal of any person from the hearing room who is
creating a disturbance, whether by physical actions, profanity or conduct, that
disrupts the hearing;
14) identify the issues, consider all relevant facts and receive
or request any additional information necessary to decide the matter in
dispute, including but not limited to additional testimony, documents,
exhibits, briefs, memoranda of law or post hearing briefs;
15) present a written opinion and recommendation to the Director
after the record of the administrative hearing is completed or transcript is
received, whichever is later. The written opinion and recommendation shall
include a recommended decision on whether there is a preponderance of evidence
of abuse or neglect based on information in the administrative record
or post hearing briefs;
15) present a written opinion and recommendation to the Director
after the record of the administrative hearing is completed or transcript is
received, whichever is later. The written opinion and recommendation shall
include a recommended decision on whether there is a preponderance of evidence
of abuse or neglect based on information in the administrative record. The
opinion shall contain findings of fact, summary of testimony and evidence, conclusions
of law and a recommendation; and
16) the
written opinion and recommendation must also include the basis for excluding
any evidence or disallowing a physician or other professional from testifying
by telephone pursuant to Section 336.170 (Testimony by Telephone).
c) The Chief ALJ shall also:
1) ensure that the administrative hearing is scheduled at a time
and place reasonably convenient for all parties;
2) provide a written notice to the parties within 10 days after
the receipt of a sufficient request for an administrative hearing, that shall
contain the following information:
A) the date and time of the pre-hearing conference;
B) the reasons that may be deemed an abandonment of the request
for a hearing, thus constituting a waiver of the right to a hearing;
C) a citation to the ANCRA provision that grants the Department of
Children and Family Services the legal authority and jurisdiction to hold this
hearing;
D) a reference to the particular Sections of the statutes and
administrative rules involved;
E) the allegations that were indicated;
F) the consequences of the appellant's failure to participate at
the pre-hearing conference;
G) the docket number assigned to this case;
H) the name and contact information of the Administrative Law
Judge and all parties; and
I) a statement of the parties' rights during the administrative
hearing.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.